Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGBX vs RGACX
BFGBX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BFGBX vs RGACX
BlackRock Capital Appreciation K
Price$46.35
Change+$0.15 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.88B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
BFGBX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGBX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGBX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. BFGBX (3.88B). RGACX pays higher dividends than BFGBX: RGACX (0.07) vs BFGBX (0.00). BFGBX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BFGBX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than BFGBX (0.64). BFGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFGBX: RGACX (250) vs BFGBX (5000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. BFGBX (7.39). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. BFGBX (23.24).
| BFGBX | RGACX | BFGBX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.94 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.94 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.725 | 17.183 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.88B | 337B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.39 | 12.22 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.10 | 71.26 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.24 | 45.63 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.11 | 111.15 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement