BFC
Price
$120.95
Change
-$0.08 (-0.07%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
2 days until earnings call
SBSI
Price
$27.16
Change
+$0.72 (+2.72%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
816.98M
6 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFC vs SBSI

Header iconBFC vs SBSI Comparison
Open Charts BFC vs SBSIBanner chart's image
Bank First
Price$120.95
Change-$0.08 (-0.07%)
Volume$94.62K
Capitalization1.19B
Southside Bancshares
Price$27.16
Change+$0.72 (+2.72%)
Volume$154.62K
Capitalization816.98M
BFC vs SBSI Comparison Chart in %
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFC vs. SBSI commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFC is a Hold and SBSI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BFC: $120.95 vs. SBSI: $27.16)
Brand notoriety: BFC and SBSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFC: 95% vs. SBSI: 126%
Market capitalization -- BFC: $1.19B vs. SBSI: $816.98M
BFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.19B. SBSI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $816.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBSI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBSI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFC is a better buy in the long-term than SBSI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBSI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SBSI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBSI is a better buy in the short-term than BFC.

Price Growth

BFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.55% price change this week, while SBSI (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

SBSI is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFC($1.19B) has a higher market cap than SBSI($817M). BFC has higher P/E ratio than SBSI: BFC (17.45) vs SBSI (9.67). BFC YTD gains are higher at: 27.319 vs. SBSI (-11.334). SBSI has more cash in the bank: 110M vs. BFC (84.7M). BFC has less debt than SBSI: BFC (122M) vs SBSI (779M). SBSI has higher revenues than BFC: SBSI (260M) vs BFC (162M).
BFCSBSIBFC / SBSI
Capitalization1.19B817M146%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.319-11.334-241%
P/E Ratio17.459.67181%
Revenue162M260M62%
Total Cash84.7M110M77%
Total Debt122M779M16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFC vs SBSI: Fundamental Ratings
BFC
SBSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
452
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1864
SMR RATING
1..100
3527
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5181
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1380
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBSI's Valuation (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFC (77). This means that SBSI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBSI (64). This means that BFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBSI’s over the last 12 months.

SBSI's SMR Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (35). This means that SBSI’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBSI (81). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to SBSI’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBSI (80). This means that BFC’s stock grew significantly faster than SBSI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFCSBSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMSHX26.070.14
+0.54%
Franklin Mutual Shares R6
GBCCX15.810.02
+0.13%
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
IASRX23.610.02
+0.08%
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl R
IEGFX22.86-0.05
-0.22%
Invesco International Small Company R6
IGNRX18.94-0.33
-1.71%
Macquarie Natural Resources R

BFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFC has been closely correlated with MBWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFC jumps, then MBWM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFC
1D Price
Change %
BFC100%
-0.07%
MBWM - BFC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
CTBI - BFC
84%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
IBCP - BFC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
SBSI - BFC
83%
Closely correlated
+2.72%
FCBC - BFC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
More

SBSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBSI has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBSI jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBSI
1D Price
Change %
SBSI100%
+2.72%
STBA - SBSI
92%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
FFIN - SBSI
91%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
UBSI - SBSI
90%
Closely correlated
+2.68%
BANF - SBSI
89%
Closely correlated
-1.53%
FCF - SBSI
89%
Closely correlated
+2.51%
More