BFC
Price
$123.79
Change
+$0.79 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
839.24M
16 days until earnings call
CZFS
Price
$64.44
Change
+$1.35 (+2.14%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
231.58M
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFC vs CZFS

Header iconBFC vs CZFS Comparison
Open Charts BFC vs CZFSBanner chart's image
Bank First
Price$123.79
Change+$0.79 (+0.64%)
Volume$241.66K
Capitalization839.24M
Citizens Financial Services
Price$64.44
Change+$1.35 (+2.14%)
Volume$2.69K
Capitalization231.58M
BFC vs CZFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFC vs. CZFS commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFC is a Buy and CZFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BFC: $123.79 vs. CZFS: $64.44)
Brand notoriety: BFC and CZFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFC: 246% vs. CZFS: 33%
Market capitalization -- BFC: $839.24M vs. CZFS: $231.58M
BFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $839.24M. CZFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $231.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCZFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CZFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFC is a better buy in the long-term than CZFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CZFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CZFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the short-term than BFC.

Price Growth

BFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.26% price change this week, while CZFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +11.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

CZFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFC($839M) has a higher market cap than CZFS($232M). CZFS (11.92) and BFC (11.37) have similar P/E ratio . BFC YTD gains are higher at: 29.843 vs. CZFS (4.595). BFC has less debt than CZFS: BFC (51.4M) vs CZFS (322M). BFC has higher revenues than CZFS: BFC (137M) vs CZFS (91.9M).
BFCCZFSBFC / CZFS
Capitalization839M232M362%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.8434.595649%
P/E Ratio11.3711.9295%
Revenue137M91.9M149%
Total Cash46.3MN/A-
Total Debt51.4M322M16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFC vs CZFS: Fundamental Ratings
BFC
CZFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8743
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1464
SMR RATING
1..100
2536
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1362
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZFS's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFC (92) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZFS (64) in the null industry. This means that BFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (36) in the null industry. This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (44) in the null industry. This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZFS (62) in the null industry. This means that BFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFCCZFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
38%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYIIX161.711.91
+1.20%
Rydex Internet Inv
FKUQX24.090.19
+0.79%
Franklin Utilities A
BPSIX27.080.21
+0.78%
Boston Partners Small Cap Value II I
SMBYX41.940.31
+0.74%
ClearBridge Mid Cap I
TPLNX19.320.07
+0.36%
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value A

BFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFC has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFC jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFC
1D Price
Change %
BFC100%
+0.64%
CTBI - BFC
88%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
MCBS - BFC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
FMBH - BFC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
FCBC - BFC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
AROW - BFC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
More

CZFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been closely correlated with BFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then BFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZFS
1D Price
Change %
CZFS100%
+2.14%
BFC - CZFS
72%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
PFIS - CZFS
72%
Closely correlated
+2.50%
AROW - CZFS
71%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
UVSP - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
+4.44%
MCBS - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
More