BFAM
Price
$100.19
Change
+$0.16 (+0.16%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.67B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRNR
Price
$2.60
Change
-$0.31 (-10.65%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.41M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFAM vs TRNR

Header iconBFAM vs TRNR Comparison
Open Charts BFAM vs TRNRBanner chart's image
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
Price$100.19
Change+$0.16 (+0.16%)
Volume$637.2K
Capitalization5.67B
Interactive Strength
Price$2.60
Change-$0.31 (-10.65%)
Volume$63.23K
Capitalization5.41M
BFAM vs TRNR Comparison Chart in %
BFAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRNR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFAM vs. TRNR commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFAM is a Hold and TRNR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BFAM: $100.19 vs. TRNR: $2.60)
Brand notoriety: BFAM and TRNR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFAM: 81% vs. TRNR: 33%
Market capitalization -- BFAM: $5.67B vs. TRNR: $5.41M
BFAM [@Personnel Services] is valued at $5.67B. TRNR’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $5.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRNR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRNR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRNR is a better buy in the long-term than BFAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRNR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRNR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRNR is a better buy in the short-term than BFAM.

Price Growth

BFAM (@Personnel Services) experienced а +2.39% price change this week, while TRNR (@Personnel Services) price change was +1.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +462.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-3.17% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFAM($5.67B) has a higher market cap than TRNR($5.41M). BFAM has higher P/E ratio than TRNR: BFAM (28.87) vs TRNR (0.01). BFAM YTD gains are higher at: -9.617 vs. TRNR (-89.772). BFAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 375M vs. TRNR (-8.49M). BFAM has more cash in the bank: 179M vs. TRNR (582K). TRNR has less debt than BFAM: TRNR (55.4M) vs BFAM (1.75B). BFAM has higher revenues than TRNR: BFAM (2.79B) vs TRNR (6.97M).
BFAMTRNRBFAM / TRNR
Capitalization5.67B5.41M104,790%
EBITDA375M-8.49M-4,416%
Gain YTD-9.617-89.77211%
P/E Ratio28.870.01461,454%
Revenue2.79B6.97M40,017%
Total Cash179M582K30,756%
Total Debt1.75B55.4M3,161%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFAM: Fundamental Ratings
BFAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFAMTRNR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRNR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDTOX38.87N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock A
RIREX80.07-0.64
-0.79%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R4
FGREX9.14-0.11
-1.19%
Invesco Global Real Estate R6
GSSQX70.50-1.23
-1.71%
Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights A
RSNYX47.77-0.89
-1.83%
Victory Global Energy Transition Y

BFAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFAM has been loosely correlated with MCW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFAM jumps, then MCW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFAM
1D Price
Change %
BFAM100%
+0.16%
MCW - BFAM
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
TNL - BFAM
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
ABNB - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
CCL - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.65%
ROL - BFAM
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
More

TRNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRNR and YTRA have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRNR and YTRA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRNR
1D Price
Change %
TRNR100%
+1.92%
YTRA - TRNR
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.68%
BFAM - TRNR
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
CCL - TRNR
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
CSV - TRNR
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
LIND - TRNR
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More