BFAM
Price
$122.31
Change
+$1.79 (+1.49%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.52B
36 days until earnings call
RGS
Price
$22.65
Change
+$1.64 (+7.81%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
17.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFAM vs RGS

Header iconBFAM vs RGS Comparison
Open Charts BFAM vs RGSBanner chart's image
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
Price$122.31
Change+$1.79 (+1.49%)
Volume$1.06M
Capitalization6.52B
Regis
Price$22.65
Change+$1.64 (+7.81%)
Volume$12.78K
Capitalization17.1M
BFAM vs RGS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFAM vs. RGS commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFAM is a Buy and RGS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BFAM: $122.31 vs. RGS: $22.65)
Brand notoriety: BFAM and RGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFAM: 219% vs. RGS: 117%
Market capitalization -- BFAM: $6.52B vs. RGS: $17.1M
BFAM [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $6.52B. RGS’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $17.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $10.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGS is a better buy in the long-term than BFAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • RGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGS is a better buy in the short-term than BFAM.

Price Growth

BFAM (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while RGS (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +9.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+0.89% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFAM($6.52B) has a higher market cap than RGS($17.1M). BFAM YTD gains are higher at: 10.338 vs. RGS (-4.511). BFAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 282M vs. RGS (22.2M). BFAM has more cash in the bank: 93.6M vs. RGS (7.15M). RGS has less debt than BFAM: RGS (525M) vs BFAM (1.86B). BFAM has higher revenues than RGS: BFAM (2.42B) vs RGS (216M).
BFAMRGSBFAM / RGS
Capitalization6.52B17.1M38,129%
EBITDA282M22.2M1,270%
Gain YTD10.338-4.511-229%
P/E Ratio87.88N/A-
Revenue2.42B216M1,119%
Total Cash93.6M7.15M1,309%
Total Debt1.86B525M354%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFAM vs RGS: Fundamental Ratings
BFAM
RGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5015
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92100
SMR RATING
1..100
608
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5655
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9257
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8524

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGS's Valuation (83) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BFAM (93) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

BFAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that BFAM’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's SMR Rating (8) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFAM (60) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BFAM (56) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFAM (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFAMRGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRAD28.050.91
+3.35%
Sportradar Group AG
AMRC15.160.35
+2.36%
Ameresco
GRMN208.363.21
+1.56%
Garmin Ltd
DMAC3.840.03
+0.79%
DiaMedica Therapeutics
RMCO1.25-0.01
-0.79%
Royalty Management Holding Corp

BFAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFAM has been loosely correlated with MCW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFAM jumps, then MCW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFAM
1D Price
Change %
BFAM100%
+1.49%
MCW - BFAM
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
TNL - BFAM
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
ABNB - BFAM
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
TRIP - BFAM
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
CCL - BFAM
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
More

RGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and CCL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and CCL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGS
1D Price
Change %
RGS100%
+7.81%
CCL - RGS
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
LIND - RGS
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
BFAM - RGS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
TNL - RGS
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
RCL - RGS
18%
Poorly correlated
+4.60%
More