BFAM vs RGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFAM is a Hold and RGS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BFAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- RGS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BFAM (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while RGS (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +10.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +3.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.96%.
Reported Earning Dates
BFAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
RGS is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Services (+3.79% weekly)Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
| BFAM | RGS | BFAM / RGS | |
| Capitalization | 6.52B | 17.1M | 38,129% |
| EBITDA | 282M | 22.2M | 1,270% |
| Gain YTD | 10.347 | -11.636 | -89% |
| P/E Ratio | 87.88 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.42B | 216M | 1,119% |
| Total Cash | 93.6M | 7.15M | 1,309% |
| Total Debt | 1.86B | 525M | 354% |
BFAM | RGS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RGS's Valuation (84) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BFAM (93) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to BFAM’s over the last 12 months.
BFAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that BFAM’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.
RGS's SMR Rating (8) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFAM (65) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.
RGS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BFAM (51) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to BFAM’s over the last 12 months.
RGS's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFAM (93) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.
| BFAM | RGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 12 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 68% |
BFAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFAM has been loosely correlated with MCW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFAM jumps, then MCW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFAM | 100% | +1.98% | ||
| MCW - BFAM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| TNL - BFAM | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| ABNB - BFAM | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| TRIP - BFAM | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.50% | ||
| CSV - BFAM | 31% Poorly correlated | +4.38% | ||
More | ||||
RGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and CCL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and CCL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGS | 100% | -1.36% | ||
| CCL - RGS | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
| BFAM - RGS | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
| LIND - RGS | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| TNL - RGS | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
| RCL - RGS | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||