BFAM
Price
$116.87
Change
+$0.54 (+0.46%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.64B
59 days until earnings call
RCL
Price
$352.39
Change
-$7.67 (-2.13%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
95.69B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFAM vs RCL

Header iconBFAM vs RCL Comparison
Open Charts BFAM vs RCLBanner chart's image
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
Price$116.87
Change+$0.54 (+0.46%)
Volume$3.2K
Capitalization6.64B
Royal Caribbean Group
Price$352.39
Change-$7.67 (-2.13%)
Volume$5.82K
Capitalization95.69B
BFAM vs RCL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFAM vs. RCL commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFAM is a Hold and RCL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BFAM: $116.33 vs. RCL: $360.06)
Brand notoriety: BFAM: Not notable vs. RCL: Notable
BFAM represents the Personnel Services, while RCL is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFAM: 64% vs. RCL: 52%
Market capitalization -- BFAM: $6.64B vs. RCL: $95.69B
BFAM [@Personnel Services] is valued at $6.64B. RCL’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $95.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.39B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $178.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.79B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRCL’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RCL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, RCL is a better buy in the long-term than BFAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • RCL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RCL is a better buy in the short-term than BFAM.

Price Growth

BFAM (@Personnel Services) experienced а -1.71% price change this week, while RCL (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -1.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -4.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.45%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +7.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

RCL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-4.46% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

@Consumer Sundries (+7.07% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCL($95.7B) has a higher market cap than BFAM($6.64B). BFAM has higher P/E ratio than RCL: BFAM (38.30) vs RCL (26.19). RCL YTD gains are higher at: 57.066 vs. BFAM (4.944). RCL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.62B vs. BFAM (375M). RCL has more cash in the bank: 735M vs. BFAM (179M). BFAM has less debt than RCL: BFAM (1.75B) vs RCL (19.7B). RCL has higher revenues than BFAM: RCL (17.2B) vs BFAM (2.79B).
BFAMRCLBFAM / RCL
Capitalization6.64B95.7B7%
EBITDA375M6.62B6%
Gain YTD4.94457.0669%
P/E Ratio38.3026.19146%
Revenue2.79B17.2B16%
Total Cash179M735M24%
Total Debt1.75B19.7B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFAM vs RCL: Fundamental Ratings
BFAM
RCL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6622
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1008
SMR RATING
1..100
5920
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
791
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9515
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RCL's Valuation (58) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFAM (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

RCL's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for BFAM (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RCL’s stock grew significantly faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

RCL's SMR Rating (20) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFAM (59) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

RCL's Price Growth Rating (1) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for BFAM (79) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RCL’s stock grew significantly faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

RCL's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for BFAM (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RCL’s stock grew significantly faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFAMRCL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASVHX10.750.15
+1.42%
American Century Small Cap Value G
RGAAX75.060.78
+1.05%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R1
FLIIX12.160.02
+0.16%
First Sentier Global Listed Infras I
FGNCX12.490.01
+0.08%
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
AGYCX21.10-0.29
-1.36%
American Century Global Gold C

BFAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFAM has been loosely correlated with MCW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFAM jumps, then MCW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFAM
1D Price
Change %
BFAM100%
-0.11%
MCW - BFAM
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
TNL - BFAM
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
ABNB - BFAM
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
CCL - BFAM
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
RCL - BFAM
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
More

RCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCL has been closely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RCL jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCL
1D Price
Change %
RCL100%
+1.43%
CUK - RCL
86%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
CCL - RCL
85%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
NCLH - RCL
79%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
VIK - RCL
77%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
TNL - RCL
68%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
More