Advertisement
BFAM vs MCW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFAM is a Buy and MCW is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MCW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BFAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MCW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BFAM (@Personnel Services) experienced а -3.42% price change this week, while MCW (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -2.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
BFAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
MCW is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Personnel Services (-2.02% weekly)Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.
@Automotive Aftermarket (-2.51% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| BFAM | MCW | BFAM / MCW | |
| Capitalization | 6.1B | 1.74B | 350% |
| EBITDA | 375M | 273M | 137% |
| Gain YTD | -3.239 | -26.886 | 12% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.17 | 20.50 | 172% |
| Revenue | 2.79B | 1.03B | 271% |
| Total Cash | 179M | 26.4M | 678% |
| Total Debt | 1.75B | 1.79B | 98% |
BFAM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BFAM | MCW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
BFAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFAM has been loosely correlated with MCW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFAM jumps, then MCW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFAM | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| MCW - BFAM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| TNL - BFAM | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| ABNB - BFAM | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| CCL - BFAM | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| RCL - BFAM | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||
MCW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCW has been loosely correlated with DRVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCW jumps, then DRVN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCW | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| DRVN - MCW | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| PAG - MCW | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| RUSHA - MCW | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| ABG - MCW | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| RUSHB - MCW | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||