BFAM
Price
$100.70
Change
+$1.13 (+1.13%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.69B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EM
Price
$1.21
Change
+$0.01 (+0.83%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
306.85M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFAM vs EM

Header iconBFAM vs EM Comparison
Open Charts BFAM vs EMBanner chart's image
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
Price$100.70
Change+$1.13 (+1.13%)
Volume$191.57K
Capitalization5.69B
Smart Share Global
Price$1.21
Change+$0.01 (+0.83%)
Volume$324.78K
Capitalization306.85M
BFAM vs EM Comparison Chart in %
BFAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFAM vs. EM commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFAM is a Hold and EM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BFAM: $100.70 vs. EM: $1.21)
Brand notoriety: BFAM and EM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFAM: 23% vs. EM: 43%
Market capitalization -- BFAM: $5.69B vs. EM: $306.85M
BFAM [@Personnel Services] is valued at $5.69B. EM’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $306.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $29.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EM is a better buy in the long-term than BFAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EM is a better buy in the short-term than BFAM.

Price Growth

BFAM (@Personnel Services) experienced а -3.65% price change this week, while EM (@Personnel Services) price change was -9.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-0.87% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFAM($5.7B) has a higher market cap than EM($307M). EM has higher P/E ratio than BFAM: EM (64.39) vs BFAM (29.02). EM YTD gains are higher at: 68.056 vs. BFAM (-9.157). BFAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 408M vs. EM (101M). EM has more cash in the bank: 3.04B vs. BFAM (117M). EM has less debt than BFAM: EM (10.6M) vs BFAM (1.75B). BFAM has higher revenues than EM: BFAM (2.87B) vs EM (1.96B).
BFAMEMBFAM / EM
Capitalization5.7B307M1,855%
EBITDA408M101M404%
Gain YTD-9.15768.056-13%
P/E Ratio29.0264.3945%
Revenue2.87B1.96B147%
Total Cash117M3.04B4%
Total Debt1.75B10.6M16,500%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFAM: Fundamental Ratings
BFAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
56
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFAMEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DAADX12.250.03
+0.25%
DFA Emerging Mkts ex China Cr Eq Instl
PCBKX12.730.03
+0.24%
Victory Pioneer Balanced R6
CIBCX77.490.13
+0.17%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
PMPSX154.04N/A
N/A
ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Svc
JIGCX56.76-0.06
-0.11%
Janus Henderson Overseas C

BFAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFAM has been loosely correlated with MCW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFAM jumps, then MCW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFAM
1D Price
Change %
BFAM100%
+1.13%
MCW - BFAM
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
TNL - BFAM
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
ABNB - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
CCL - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
ROL - BFAM
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More

EM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EM and TCOM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EM and TCOM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EM
1D Price
Change %
EM100%
+0.83%
TCOM - EM
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
BFAM - EM
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
CCL - EM
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
LIND - EM
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
SABR - EM
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
More