BEWFF vs CYCA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEWFF is a Hold and CYCA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BEWFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCYCA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BEWFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- CYCA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
BEWFF (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +1.43% price change this week, while CYCA (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +5.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
CYCA is expected to report earnings on Feb 14, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Telecommunications Equipment (-2.30% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
| BEWFF | CYCA | BEWFF / CYCA | |
| Capitalization | 13.3M | 17.6M | 76% |
| EBITDA | 1.11M | -4.11M | -27% |
| Gain YTD | 145.290 | 1.442 | 10,073% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.11 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 10.3M | 18K | 57,222% |
| Total Cash | 3.54M | 214K | 1,652% |
| Total Debt | 764K | 120K | 637% |
BEWFF | CYCA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BEWFF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CYCA (100). This means that BEWFF’s stock grew similarly to CYCA’s over the last 12 months.
BEWFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYCA (100). This means that BEWFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CYCA’s over the last 12 months.
BEWFF's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYCA (100). This means that BEWFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CYCA’s over the last 12 months.
BEWFF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CYCA (64). This means that BEWFF’s stock grew similarly to CYCA’s over the last 12 months.
BEWFF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYCA (100). This means that BEWFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CYCA’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
BEWFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BEWFF and CYSNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEWFF and CYSNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BEWFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEWFF | 100% | +2.53% | ||
| CYSNF - BEWFF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AACAF - BEWFF | 10% Poorly correlated | -5.83% | ||
| BYLTF - BEWFF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UI - BEWFF | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| ASTS - BEWFF | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.91% | ||
More | ||||
CYCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CYCA and CMBM have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYCA and CMBM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYCA | 100% | -2.31% | ||
| CMBM - CYCA | 4% Poorly correlated | +6.19% | ||
| BEWFF - CYCA | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.53% | ||
| ADVOF - CYCA | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASTS - CYCA | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.91% | ||
| BYLTF - CYCA | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||