It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BESVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUCTT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BESVF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCTT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BESVF (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -3.24% price change this week, while UCTT (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -2.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.36%.
UCTT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
BESVF | UCTT | BESVF / UCTT | |
Capitalization | 11.4B | 1.03B | 1,109% |
EBITDA | 229M | 4.7M | 4,872% |
Gain YTD | -3.426 | -36.940 | 9% |
P/E Ratio | 55.35 | 39.89 | 139% |
Revenue | 602M | 2.14B | 28% |
Total Cash | 330M | 327M | 101% |
Total Debt | 541M | 648M | 83% |
BESVF | UCTT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BESVF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCTT (66) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that BESVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
BESVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCTT (100) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that BESVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
BESVF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UCTT (95) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that BESVF’s stock grew significantly faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
BESVF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as UCTT (64) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that BESVF’s stock grew similarly to UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
BESVF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCTT (100) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that BESVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
BESVF | UCTT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago39% | 3 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago39% | 3 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago49% | 3 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago38% | 3 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago89% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TEQHX | 13.06 | 0.02 | +0.15% |
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq Idx I | |||
TMMAX | 18.31 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
SEI Tax-Managed Mgd Volatility F (SIMT) | |||
RLSMX | 11.61 | N/A | N/A |
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select R6 | |||
BGEEX | 18.56 | -0.03 | -0.16% |
BlackRock GA Dynamic Eq K | |||
PMIAX | 11.02 | -0.02 | -0.18% |
Putnam Multi-Asset Income A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BESVF has been loosely correlated with DISPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BESVF jumps, then DISPF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BESVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BESVF | 100% | -3.24% | ||
DISPF - BESVF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
VECO - BESVF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
DINRF - BESVF | 23% Poorly correlated | +11.42% | ||
AMD - BESVF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
UCTT - BESVF | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.70% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCTT has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCTT jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UCTT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UCTT | 100% | -3.70% | ||
AMAT - UCTT | 71% Closely correlated | -14.07% | ||
RMBS - UCTT | 69% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
ENTG - UCTT | 69% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
NXPI - UCTT | 67% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
AMKR - UCTT | 66% Closely correlated | -3.10% | ||
More |