BEOB
Price
$90.50
Change
-$1.20 (-1.31%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
112.4M
GPFOF
Price
$2.62
Change
+$0.07 (+2.75%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
16.21B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BEOB vs GPFOF

Header iconBEOB vs GPFOF Comparison
Open Charts BEOB vs GPFOFBanner chart's image
BEO Ban
Price$90.50
Change-$1.20 (-1.31%)
Volume$197
Capitalization112.4M
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.62
Change+$0.07 (+2.75%)
Volume$420
Capitalization16.21B
BEOB vs GPFOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BEOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BEOB vs. GPFOF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEOB is a Buy and GPFOF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BEOB: $90.50 vs. GPFOF: $2.62)
Brand notoriety: BEOB and GPFOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BEOB: 37% vs. GPFOF: 25%
Market capitalization -- BEOB: $112.4M vs. GPFOF: $16.21B
BEOB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $112.4M. GPFOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $16.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BEOB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGPFOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BEOB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BEOB is a better buy in the long-term than GPFOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BEOB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPFOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BEOB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GPFOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPFOF is a better buy in the short-term than BEOB.

Price Growth

BEOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.55% price change this week, while GPFOF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($16.2B) has a higher market cap than BEOB($112M). GPFOF has higher P/E ratio than BEOB: GPFOF (7.77) vs BEOB (6.85). BEOB YTD gains are higher at: 17.601 vs. GPFOF (11.494). BEOB has less debt than GPFOF: BEOB (9.4M) vs GPFOF (51.5B). GPFOF has higher revenues than BEOB: GPFOF (85.7B) vs BEOB (52.9M).
BEOBGPFOFBEOB / GPFOF
Capitalization112M16.2B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.60111.494153%
P/E Ratio6.857.7788%
Revenue52.9M85.7B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.4M51.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BEOB vs GPFOF: Fundamental Ratings
BEOB
GPFOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9136
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
132
SMR RATING
1..100
352
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4569
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BEOB's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (48). This means that BEOB’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

BEOB's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (32). This means that BEOB’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEOB (35). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEOB’s over the last 12 months.

BEOB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (53). This means that BEOB’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

BEOB's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (69). This means that BEOB’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BEOBGPFOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
17%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BEOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRAGX16.410.05
+0.31%
Lord Abbett International Growth R3
QASGX28.020.04
+0.14%
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth A
FMIHX15.66-0.01
-0.06%
FMI Large Cap Investor
JHQDX19.19-0.03
-0.16%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 I
ENHNX10.55-0.03
-0.28%
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income I

BEOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BEOB has been loosely correlated with SUGBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BEOB jumps, then SUGBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BEOB
1D Price
Change %
BEOB100%
N/A
SUGBY - BEOB
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMGGF - BEOB
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPFOF - BEOB
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPCB - BEOB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXSR - BEOB
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with MCHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then MCHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
MCHB - GPFOF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BEOB - GPFOF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSBK - GPFOF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNMB - GPFOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSBX - GPFOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More