BENF
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.11 (-15.49%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
SLFPF
Price
$1.77
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

BENF vs SLFPF

Header iconBENF vs SLFPF Comparison
Open Charts BENF vs SLFPFBanner chart's image
Beneficient
Price$0.60
Change-$0.11 (-15.49%)
Volume$482.42K
CapitalizationN/A
ABRDN
Price$1.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$150
CapitalizationN/A
BENF vs SLFPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BENF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BENF vs. SLFPF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BENF is a Hold and SLFPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BENF: $0.60 vs. SLFPF: $1.77)
Brand notoriety: BENF and SLFPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BENF: 18% vs. SLFPF: 10%
Market capitalization -- BENF: $18.83M vs. SLFPF: $5.79B
BENF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $18.83M. SLFPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BENF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLFPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BENF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLFPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BENF and SLFPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BENF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BENF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BENF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -23.69% price change this week, while SLFPF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

BENF is expected to report earnings on Feb 23, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLFPF($5.79B) has a higher market cap than BENF($18.8M). SLFPF YTD gains are higher at: -19.910 vs. BENF (-98.448). SLFPF has more cash in the bank: 1.34B vs. BENF (11.2M). BENF has less debt than SLFPF: BENF (48.7M) vs SLFPF (707M). SLFPF has higher revenues than BENF: SLFPF (2.31B) vs BENF (-74.27M).
BENFSLFPFBENF / SLFPF
Capitalization18.8M5.79B0%
EBITDA-2.49BN/A-
Gain YTD-98.448-19.910494%
P/E RatioN/A7.54-
Revenue-74.27M2.31B-3%
Total Cash11.2M1.34B1%
Total Debt48.7M707M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLFPF: Fundamental Ratings
SLFPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
83
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
37

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BENF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BENF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

BENF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BENF has been closely correlated with GLAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BENF jumps, then GLAD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BENF
1D Price
Change %
BENF100%
-14.93%
GLAD - BENF
87%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
TRRPF - BENF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SLFPF - BENF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRDG - BENF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
BXSL - BENF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More

SLFPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPF and SLFPY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPF and SLFPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPF
1D Price
Change %
SLFPF100%
N/A
SLFPY - SLFPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.67%
HALFF - SLFPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BENF - SLFPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-14.93%
STJPF - SLFPF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUILF - SLFPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More