BEN
Price
$24.97
Change
-$0.77 (-2.99%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.96B
59 days until earnings call
CNS
Price
$72.54
Change
-$0.14 (-0.19%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.7B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BEN vs CNS

Header iconBEN vs CNS Comparison
Open Charts BEN vs CNSBanner chart's image
Franklin Resources
Price$24.97
Change-$0.77 (-2.99%)
Volume$4.71M
Capitalization12.96B
Cohen & Steers
Price$72.54
Change-$0.14 (-0.19%)
Volume$143.15K
Capitalization3.7B
BEN vs CNS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BEN vs. CNS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEN is a Hold and CNS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BEN: $24.97 vs. CNS: $72.54)
Brand notoriety: BEN and CNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BEN: 128% vs. CNS: 61%
Market capitalization -- BEN: $12.96B vs. CNS: $3.7B
BEN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $12.96B. CNS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BEN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCNS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BEN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BEN is a better buy in the long-term than CNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BEN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BEN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BEN is a better buy in the short-term than CNS.

Price Growth

BEN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.69% price change this week, while CNS (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

BEN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

CNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BEN($13B) has a higher market cap than CNS($3.7B). BEN has higher P/E ratio than CNS: BEN (48.96) vs CNS (23.03). BEN YTD gains are higher at: 26.872 vs. CNS (-19.585). BEN has more cash in the bank: 3.96B vs. CNS (187M). CNS has less debt than BEN: CNS (142M) vs BEN (13.2B).
BENCNSBEN / CNS
Capitalization13B3.7B351%
EBITDA1.13BN/A-
Gain YTD26.872-19.585-137%
P/E Ratio48.9623.03213%
Revenue8.64BN/A-
Total Cash3.96B187M2,116%
Total Debt13.2B142M9,296%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BEN vs CNS: Fundamental Ratings
BEN
CNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5854
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6563
SMR RATING
1..100
9029
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1677
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
487
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BEN's Valuation (14) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CNS (22). This means that BEN’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BEN (65). This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to BEN’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's SMR Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEN (90). This means that CNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

BEN's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNS (77). This means that BEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNS’s over the last 12 months.

BEN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNS (87). This means that BEN’s stock grew significantly faster than CNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BENCNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHID35.410.18
+0.52%
JHancock International High Dividend ETF
BUCK23.860.09
+0.38%
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
FALN27.400.07
+0.26%
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
QQQG22.860.05
+0.21%
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Csh CwsGrLdrsETF
BITI18.87-0.28
-1.46%
ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF

BEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BEN has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BEN jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BEN
1D Price
Change %
BEN100%
-2.99%
TROW - BEN
74%
Closely correlated
-3.01%
APAM - BEN
73%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
JHG - BEN
70%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
AMG - BEN
70%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
BLK - BEN
68%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
More

CNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNS
1D Price
Change %
CNS100%
-0.19%
APAM - CNS
75%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
BX - CNS
70%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
VRTS - CNS
68%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
TROW - CNS
68%
Closely correlated
-3.01%
BN - CNS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More