Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMRX vs RNWBX
BEMRX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts BEMRX vs RNWBX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value R6
Price$12.38
Change+$0.10 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets980.92M
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
BEMRX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMRX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMRX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. BEMRX (981M). BEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: BEMRX (2.40) vs RNWBX (0.12). BEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: BEMRX (9 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than BEMRX (1.10). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMRX (21.13). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMRX: RNWBX (250) vs BEMRX (1000000). BEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.91 vs. RNWBX (19.18). BEMRX return over 5 years is better than : 65.35 vs. RNWBX (7.90).
| BEMRX | RNWBX | BEMRX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.67 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.67 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 48.096 | 20.884 | 230% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 981M | 75.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 0.12 | 2,033% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.91 | 19.18 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.51 | 41.02 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.35 | 7.90 | 827% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement