Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWHX
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$13.30
Change-$0.11 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.08
Change-$0.45 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. BEMIX (1.11B). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMIX (1.98) vs RNWHX (1.25). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMIX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMIX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMIX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 60.05 vs. RNWHX (27.68). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 73.47 vs. RNWHX (11.69).
| BEMIX | RNWHX | BEMIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.189 | 6.092 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 1.25 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 60.05 | 27.68 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.72 | 43.24 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.47 | 11.69 | 629% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.52 | 124.21 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement