Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWHX
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$11.47
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets849.66M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. BEMIX (850M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMIX (2.48) vs RNWHX (0.93). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMIX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMIX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.16 vs. RNWHX (15.38). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 81.41 vs. RNWHX (29.08).
| BEMIX | RNWHX | BEMIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.445 | 24.375 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 850M | 74.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 0.93 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.16 | 15.38 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.85 | 57.29 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.41 | 29.08 | 280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement