Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWHX
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$11.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets849.66M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. BEMCX (850M). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMCX (1.93) vs RNWHX (0.93). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMCX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMCX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.88 vs. RNWHX (15.38). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 73.68 vs. RNWHX (29.08).
| BEMCX | RNWHX | BEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.72 | 288% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.72 | 288% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.274 | 24.375 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 850M | 74.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 0.93 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.88 | 15.38 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.04 | 57.29 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.68 | 29.08 | 253% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement