Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWHX
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$13.14
Change+$1.95 (+17.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. BEMCX (1.1B). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMCX (1.47) vs RNWHX (1.25). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMCX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMCX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.48 vs. RNWHX (27.68). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 66.17 vs. RNWHX (11.69).
| BEMCX | RNWHX | BEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.72 | 288% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.72 | 288% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.050 | 6.092 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.25 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 58.48 | 27.68 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.50 | 43.24 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.17 | 11.69 | 566% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.50 | 124.21 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers