Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWBX
BEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWBX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$11.90
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets969.96M
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
BEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. BEMCX (970M). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: BEMCX (1.82) vs RNWBX (0.12). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: BEMCX (13 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). BEMCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMCX (21.13). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.53 vs. RNWBX (18.68). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.13 vs. RNWBX (7.66).
| BEMCX | RNWBX | BEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.67 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.67 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.334 | 20.612 | 220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 970M | 75.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 0.12 | 1,546% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.53 | 18.68 | 233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.06 | 40.84 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.13 | 7.66 | 733% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.18 | 83.29 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers