Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWBX
BEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWBX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$13.14
Change+$1.95 (+17.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
BEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. BEMCX (1.1B). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: BEMCX (1.47) vs RNWBX (0.45). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: BEMCX (13 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). BEMCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMCX (21.13). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.48 vs. RNWBX (26.27). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 66.17 vs. RNWBX (7.03).
| BEMCX | RNWBX | BEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.66 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.66 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.050 | 5.996 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 0.45 | 326% |
| Returns for 1 year | 58.48 | 26.27 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.50 | 38.81 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.17 | 7.03 | 941% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.50 | 114.19 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement