Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWAX
BEMCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWAX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$11.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets849.66M
American Funds New World R1
Price$90.90
Change-$0.10 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
BEMCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. BEMCX (850M). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMCX (1.93) vs RNWAX (0.00). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMCX (13 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). BEMCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMCX (21.13). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.88 vs. RNWAX (14.21). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 73.68 vs. RNWAX (24.27).
| BEMCX | RNWAX | BEMCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.66 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.66 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.274 | 23.455 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 850M | 74.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.88 | 14.21 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.04 | 54.12 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.68 | 24.27 | 304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.90 | 85.80 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement