BELGF
Price
$0.77
Change
-$0.06 (-7.23%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
GBRCF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.01 (-2.94%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

BELGF vs GBRCF

Header iconBELGF vs GBRCF Comparison
Open Charts BELGF vs GBRCFBanner chart's image
Bellevue Gold
Price$0.77
Change-$0.06 (-7.23%)
Volume$31.1K
CapitalizationN/A
Gold Bull Resources
Price$0.33
Change-$0.01 (-2.94%)
Volume$15.01K
CapitalizationN/A
BELGF vs GBRCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BELGF vs. GBRCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BELGF is a Hold and GBRCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BELGF: $0.77 vs. GBRCF: $0.33)
Brand notoriety: BELGF and GBRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BELGF: 164% vs. GBRCF: 263%
Market capitalization -- BELGF: $1.13B vs. GBRCF: $4.08M
BELGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.13B. GBRCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BELGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGBRCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BELGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GBRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBRCF is a better buy in the long-term than BELGF.

Price Growth

BELGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.49% price change this week, while GBRCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

GBRCF is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BELGF($1.13B) has a higher market cap than GBRCF($4.08M). GBRCF YTD gains are higher at: 18.815 vs. BELGF (-33.030). GBRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.34M vs. BELGF (-20.87M). BELGF has more cash in the bank: 29.2M vs. GBRCF (1.27M). BELGF has higher revenues than GBRCF: BELGF (1.32K) vs GBRCF (0).
BELGFGBRCFBELGF / GBRCF
Capitalization1.13B4.08M27,591%
EBITDA-20.87M-2.34M892%
Gain YTD-33.03018.815-176%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.32K0-
Total Cash29.2M1.27M2,303%
Total DebtN/A42.2K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBRCF: Fundamental Ratings
GBRCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
42

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

BELGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BELGF and ALKEF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BELGF and ALKEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BELGF
1D Price
Change %
BELGF100%
-7.26%
ALKEF - BELGF
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.18%
DGMLF - BELGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
TGLDF - BELGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNCVF - BELGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-15.29%
ACDXF - BELGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GBRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBRCF and GAYMF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBRCF and GAYMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBRCF
1D Price
Change %
GBRCF100%
N/A
GAYMF - GBRCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMMSF - GBRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSISF - GBRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BONXF - GBRCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
BELGF - GBRCF
14%
Poorly correlated
-7.26%
More