BEIJF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.04B
CAOVY
Price
$8.66
Change
-$0.26 (-2.91%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.77B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BEIJF vs CAOVY

Header iconBEIJF vs CAOVY Comparison
Open Charts BEIJF vs CAOVYBanner chart's image
Beijing North Star
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization1.04B
China Overseas Land & Investment
Price$8.66
Change-$0.26 (-2.91%)
Volume$15.72K
Capitalization25.77B
BEIJF vs CAOVY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAOVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BEIJF vs. CAOVY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEIJF is a Hold and CAOVY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BEIJF: $0.08 vs. CAOVY: $8.66)
Brand notoriety: BEIJF and CAOVY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BEIJF: 100% vs. CAOVY: 326%
Market capitalization -- BEIJF: $1.04B vs. CAOVY: $25.77B
BEIJF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.04B. CAOVY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $25.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BEIJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCAOVY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BEIJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CAOVY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAOVY is a better buy in the long-term than BEIJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAOVY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CAOVY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BEIJF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CAOVY (@Real Estate Development) price change was -7.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +31.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +35.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+31.18% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAOVY($25.8B) has a higher market cap than BEIJF($1.04B). BEIJF has higher P/E ratio than CAOVY: BEIJF (45.25) vs CAOVY (7.92). CAOVY YTD gains are higher at: 15.719 vs. BEIJF (-0.518). CAOVY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.7B vs. BEIJF (-389.69M). CAOVY has higher revenues than BEIJF: CAOVY (180B) vs BEIJF (14.8B).
BEIJFCAOVYBEIJF / CAOVY
Capitalization1.04B25.8B4%
EBITDA-389.69M37.7B-1%
Gain YTD-0.51815.719-3%
P/E Ratio45.257.92571%
Revenue14.8B180B8%
Total Cash13.1BN/A-
Total Debt26.2BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BEIJF vs CAOVY: Fundamental Ratings
BEIJF
CAOVY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
9599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAOVY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as BEIJF (28). This means that CAOVY’s stock grew similarly to BEIJF’s over the last 12 months.

BEIJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as CAOVY (100). This means that BEIJF’s stock grew similarly to CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

BEIJF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CAOVY (99). This means that BEIJF’s stock grew similarly to CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

CAOVY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BEIJF (77). This means that CAOVY’s stock grew similarly to BEIJF’s over the last 12 months.

CAOVY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEIJF (61). This means that CAOVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEIJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BEIJFCAOVY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAOVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWCCX43.490.53
+1.23%
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
GFVSX16.070.15
+0.94%
Goldman Sachs Focused Value Instl
MGOAX8.980.08
+0.90%
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth A
CCVAX33.760.23
+0.69%
Calvert Small-Cap A
MCVIX32.710.13
+0.40%
MFS Mid Cap Value I

BEIJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BEIJF and AOXY have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEIJF and AOXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BEIJF
1D Price
Change %
BEIJF100%
N/A
AOXY - BEIJF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAOVY - BEIJF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.91%
CAIAF - BEIJF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AYAAY - BEIJF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARPTF - BEIJF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CAOVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAOVY has been closely correlated with LGFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAOVY jumps, then LGFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAOVY
1D Price
Change %
CAOVY100%
-2.91%
LGFRY - CAOVY
70%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
HLPPY - CAOVY
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
HLDCY - CAOVY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
BEKE - CAOVY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
XIN - CAOVY
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More