Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEGIX vs RMFCX
BEGIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BEGIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income Instl
Price$21.89
Change+$0.15 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
BEGIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEGIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEGIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. BEGIX (1.03B). RMFCX (1.20) and BEGIX (1.17) have matching dividends . BEGIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BEGIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than BEGIX (0.83). BEGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEGIX: RMFCX (250) vs BEGIX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. BEGIX (-22.79). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. BEGIX (13.52).
| BEGIX | RMFCX | BEGIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.319 | 13.689 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.20 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.79 | 4.96 | -460% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.15 | 38.79 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.52 | 57.10 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.55 | 91.18 | 47% |