It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BEEP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUGRO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BEEP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UGRO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BEEP (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -15.03% price change this week, while UGRO (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -1.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.74%.
BEEP is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2023.
UGRO is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.
The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
BEEP | UGRO | BEEP / UGRO | |
Capitalization | 112M | 16M | 700% |
EBITDA | -15.82M | -16.61M | 95% |
Gain YTD | -27.407 | 10.000 | -274% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 129.87 | - |
Revenue | 30.3M | 73.9M | 41% |
Total Cash | 11.1M | 4.77M | 233% |
Total Debt | 193M | 4.23M | 4,564% |
BEEP | UGRO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago31% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago33% | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago0% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 5 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago36% | 2 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BEEP and XOS have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEEP and XOS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BEEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BEEP | 100% | -8.41% | ||
XOS - BEEP | 11% Poorly correlated | -14.42% | ||
SHYF - BEEP | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.74% | ||
MAOIF - BEEP | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
UGRO - BEEP | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.99% | ||
AUSTF - BEEP | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that UGRO and LEV have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UGRO and LEV's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UGRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UGRO | 100% | +1.99% | ||
LEV - UGRO | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
HYFM - UGRO | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.28% | ||
SHYF - UGRO | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.74% | ||
CEAD - UGRO | 8% Poorly correlated | +3.93% | ||
PTJSF - UGRO | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.50% | ||
More |