Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEDZ vs IYC
BEDZ vs IYC Comparison
Open Charts BEDZ vs IYC
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
Price$32.53
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
Volume$400
Net Assets1.79M
iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF
Price$103.35
Change-$0.55 (-0.53%)
Volume$660
Net Assets1.45B
BEDZ vs IYC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEDZ vs. IYC commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEDZ is a Buy and IYC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYC has more net assets: 1.45B vs. BEDZ (1.79M). IYC has a higher annual dividend yield than BEDZ: IYC (0.747) vs BEDZ (-2.377). BEDZ was incepted earlier than IYC: BEDZ (5 years) vs IYC (26 years). IYC (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than BEDZ (0.99). BEDZ has a higher turnover IYC (22.00) vs IYC (22.00).
| BEDZ | IYC | BEDZ / IYC | |
| Gain YTD | -2.377 | 0.747 | -318% |
| Net Assets | 1.79M | 1.45B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.38 | 261% |
| Turnover | 137.00 | 22.00 | 623% |
| Yield | 2.36 | 0.51 | 463% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BEDZ | IYC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 13 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BEDZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BEDZ and NCLH have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEDZ and NCLH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BEDZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEDZ | 100% | -1.56% | ||
| NCLH - BEDZ | 16% Poorly correlated | -4.78% | ||
| ABNB - BEDZ | 13% Poorly correlated | -7.03% | ||
| CNTY - BEDZ | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| CCL - BEDZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
| BYD - BEDZ | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.86% | ||
More | ||||
IYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYC has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYC jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y