Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEDZ vs IYC
BEDZ vs IYC Comparison
Open Charts BEDZ vs IYC
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
Price$32.94
Change+$0.99 (+3.10%)
Volume$931
Net Assets2.75M
iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF
Price$104.41
Change+$1.13 (+1.09%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.89B
BEDZ vs IYC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEDZ vs. IYC commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEDZ is a Hold and IYC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYC has more net assets: 1.89B vs. BEDZ (2.75M). IYC has a higher annual dividend yield than BEDZ: IYC (7.898) vs BEDZ (-0.068). BEDZ was incepted earlier than IYC: BEDZ (4 years) vs IYC (25 years). IYC (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than BEDZ (0.99). BEDZ has a higher turnover IYC (22.00) vs IYC (22.00).
| BEDZ | IYC | BEDZ / IYC | |
| Gain YTD | -0.068 | 7.898 | -1% |
| Net Assets | 2.75M | 1.89B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.38 | 261% |
| Turnover | 137.00 | 22.00 | 623% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BEDZ | IYC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BEDZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BEDZ and TZOO have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEDZ and TZOO's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BEDZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEDZ | 100% | +3.12% | ||
| TZOO - BEDZ | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
| NCLH - BEDZ | 16% Poorly correlated | +3.08% | ||
| ABNB - BEDZ | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.39% | ||
| CNTY - BEDZ | 11% Poorly correlated | -4.13% | ||
| BYD - BEDZ | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
More | ||||
IYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYC has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYC jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y