| BEDZ | ITB | BEDZ / ITB | |
| Gain YTD | -2.377 | 9.128 | -26% |
| Net Assets | 1.79M | 2.88B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.38 | 261% |
| Turnover | 137.00 | 13.00 | 1,054% |
| Yield | 2.36 | 1.58 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| BEDZ | ITB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 77% | 8 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BEDZ and NCLH have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEDZ and NCLH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BEDZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEDZ | 100% | -1.56% | ||
| NCLH - BEDZ | 16% Poorly correlated | -4.78% | ||
| ABNB - BEDZ | 13% Poorly correlated | -7.03% | ||
| CNTY - BEDZ | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| CCL - BEDZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
| BYD - BEDZ | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.86% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITB has been closely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ITB jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.