BECVY
Price
$2.11
Change
-$0.14 (-6.22%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
160.94M
FJTNF
Price
$25.10
Change
-$2.63 (-9.48%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
4.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BECVY vs FJTNF

Header iconBECVY vs FJTNF Comparison
Open Charts BECVY vs FJTNFBanner chart's image
Bec World Public
Price$2.11
Change-$0.14 (-6.22%)
Volume$2.39K
Capitalization160.94M
Fuji Media Holdings
Price$25.10
Change-$2.63 (-9.48%)
Volume$38
Capitalization4.68B
BECVY vs FJTNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FJTNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BECVY vs. FJTNF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BECVY is a Hold and FJTNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BECVY: $2.07 vs. FJTNF: $25.10)
Brand notoriety: BECVY and FJTNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Broadcasting industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BECVY: 100% vs. FJTNF: 101%
Market capitalization -- BECVY: $160.94M vs. FJTNF: $4.68B
BECVY [@Broadcasting] is valued at $160.94M. FJTNF’s [@Broadcasting] market capitalization is $4.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Broadcasting] industry ranges from $18.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Broadcasting] industry is $1.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BECVY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFJTNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BECVY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FJTNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FJTNF is a better buy in the long-term than BECVY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FJTNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FJTNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BECVY (@Broadcasting) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FJTNF (@Broadcasting) price change was -9.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Broadcasting (-1.03% weekly)

Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJTNF($4.68B) has a higher market cap than BECVY($161M). BECVY has higher P/E ratio than FJTNF: BECVY (46.31) vs FJTNF (13.30). FJTNF YTD gains are higher at: 104.731 vs. BECVY (-1.311). FJTNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 77.5B vs. BECVY (1.8B). FJTNF has more cash in the bank: 198B vs. BECVY (4.77B). BECVY has less debt than FJTNF: BECVY (2.22B) vs FJTNF (351B). FJTNF has higher revenues than BECVY: FJTNF (567B) vs BECVY (4.26B).
BECVYFJTNFBECVY / FJTNF
Capitalization161M4.68B3%
EBITDA1.8B77.5B2%
Gain YTD-1.311104.731-1%
P/E Ratio46.3113.30348%
Revenue4.26B567B1%
Total Cash4.77B198B2%
Total Debt2.22B351B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BECVY vs FJTNF: Fundamental Ratings
BECVY
FJTNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
864
SMR RATING
1..100
8999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2739
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BECVY's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as FJTNF (30). This means that BECVY’s stock grew similarly to FJTNF’s over the last 12 months.

FJTNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BECVY (86). This means that FJTNF’s stock grew significantly faster than BECVY’s over the last 12 months.

BECVY's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as FJTNF (99). This means that BECVY’s stock grew similarly to FJTNF’s over the last 12 months.

FJTNF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BECVY (72). This means that FJTNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BECVY’s over the last 12 months.

BECVY's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as FJTNF (39). This means that BECVY’s stock grew similarly to FJTNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BECVYFJTNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FJTNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMUB19.270.13
+0.66%
UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP ETN Series B
PDCC16.40N/A
+0.03%
Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.
XHB107.81N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P Homebuilders ETF
TBFC27.20N/A
N/A
The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF
FDND23.49-0.07
-0.32%
FT Vest Dow Jon Internet & Trgt Inc ETF

BECVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BECVY and CURI have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BECVY and CURI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BECVY
1D Price
Change %
BECVY100%
N/A
CURI - BECVY
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.00%
UONE - BECVY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SJ - BECVY
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
FJTNF - BECVY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDIA - BECVY
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
More

FJTNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FJTNF and TGNA have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FJTNF and TGNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FJTNF
1D Price
Change %
FJTNF100%
N/A
TGNA - FJTNF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
UONE - FJTNF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UONEK - FJTNF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
BECVY - FJTNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHRT - FJTNF
-7%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
More