Advertisement
BDWBF vs HKHHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDWBF is a Hold and HKHHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BDWBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHKHHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BDWBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HKHHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BDWBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HKHHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BDWBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HKHHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
BDWBF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HKHHF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was +1.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.02%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+1.33% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| BDWBF | HKHHF | BDWBF / HKHHF | |
| Capitalization | 13.9B | 19.8B | 70% |
| EBITDA | 1.71B | 6.14B | 28% |
| Gain YTD | 24.017 | 19.248 | 125% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.09 | 18.67 | 129% |
| Revenue | 5.98B | 29.2B | 20% |
| Total Cash | 2.46B | 2.08B | 118% |
| Total Debt | 307M | 17.6B | 2% |
BDWBF | HKHHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BDWBF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as HKHHF (28). This means that BDWBF’s stock grew similarly to HKHHF’s over the last 12 months.
BDWBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HKHHF (100). This means that BDWBF’s stock grew similarly to HKHHF’s over the last 12 months.
BDWBF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as HKHHF (97). This means that BDWBF’s stock grew similarly to HKHHF’s over the last 12 months.
BDWBF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as HKHHF (55). This means that BDWBF’s stock grew similarly to HKHHF’s over the last 12 months.
BDWBF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HKHHF (87). This means that BDWBF’s stock grew significantly faster than HKHHF’s over the last 12 months.
| BDWBF | HKHHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 63% | 7 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 52% | 7 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 45% | 7 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 44% | 7 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 53% | 7 days ago 43% |
Advertisement
BDWBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BDWBF and TSGTF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDWBF and TSGTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BDWBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDWBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TSGTF - BDWBF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BDWBY - BDWBF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TSRYY - BDWBF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HKHHF - BDWBF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ABEV - BDWBF | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||
HKHHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKHHF has been loosely correlated with HEINY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKHHF jumps, then HEINY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HKHHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKHHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HEINY - HKHHF | 51% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HKHHY - HKHHF | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HINKF - HKHHF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PDRDF - HKHHF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BUD - HKHHF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
More | ||||