BDWBF vs BDWBY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDWBF is a Hold and BDWBY is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BDWBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBDWBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BDWBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BDWBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
BDWBF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а +4.73% price change this week, while BDWBY (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was -1.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.48%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Alcoholic (-0.75% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
| BDWBF | BDWBY | BDWBF / BDWBY | |
| Capitalization | 32.1B | 32.1B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 1.98B | 1.98B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 1.884 | -11.930 | -16% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.60 | 34.48 | 100% |
| Revenue | 6.48B | 6.48B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 1.93B | 1.93B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 224M | 224M | 100% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
BDWBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BDWBF and BDWBY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDWBF and BDWBY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BDWBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDWBF | 100% | +2.20% | ||
| BDWBY - BDWBF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
| CABGY - BDWBF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.88% | ||
| BUDFF - BDWBF | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
| ABEV - BDWBF | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| SNDL - BDWBF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||
BDWBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BDWBY and CRHKY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDWBY and CRHKY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BDWBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDWBY | 100% | -1.29% | ||
| CRHKY - BDWBY | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.80% | ||
| BDWBF - BDWBY | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
| CABGY - BDWBY | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.88% | ||
| TSGTF - BDWBY | 24% Poorly correlated | -12.98% | ||
| PRNDY - BDWBY | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.00% | ||
More | ||||