BDVB
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
708.41K
GGGSF
Price
$28.09
Change
+$2.93 (+11.65%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.73B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDVB vs GGGSF

Header iconBDVB vs GGGSF Comparison
Open Charts BDVB vs GGGSFBanner chart's image
Bagger Dave's Burger Tavern
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$580
Capitalization708.41K
Greggs
Price$28.09
Change+$2.93 (+11.65%)
Volume$119
Capitalization2.73B
BDVB vs GGGSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDVB vs. GGGSF commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDVB is a Hold and GGGSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BDVB: $0.02 vs. GGGSF: $25.16)
Brand notoriety: BDVB and GGGSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDVB: 21% vs. GGGSF: 46%
Market capitalization -- BDVB: $708.41K vs. GGGSF: $2.84B
BDVB [@Restaurants] is valued at $708.41K. GGGSF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $220.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDVB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGGGSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BDVB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GGGSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGGSF is a better buy in the long-term than BDVB.

Price Growth

BDVB (@Restaurants) experienced а -4.35% price change this week, while GGGSF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.86% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGGSF($2.73B) has a higher market cap than BDVB($708K). GGGSF YTD gains are higher at: -26.984 vs. BDVB (-64.401).
BDVBGGGSFBDVB / GGGSF
Capitalization708K2.73B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-64.401-26.984239%
P/E RatioN/A13.86-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDVB vs GGGSF: Fundamental Ratings
BDVB
GGGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2545
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10093
SMR RATING
1..100
732
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9778
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6889
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGGSF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDVB (52). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDVB’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as BDVB (100). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to BDVB’s over the last 12 months.

BDVB's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGSF (32). This means that BDVB’s stock grew similarly to GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as BDVB (97). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to BDVB’s over the last 12 months.

BDVB's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGSF (89). This means that BDVB’s stock grew similarly to GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

BDVB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDVB and DMPZF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDVB and DMPZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDVB
1D Price
Change %
BDVB100%
N/A
DMPZF - BDVB
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - BDVB
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.20%
KRUS - BDVB
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
GGGSF - BDVB
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGY - BDVB
-5%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
More

GGGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGSF and THCH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGSF and THCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGSF
1D Price
Change %
GGGSF100%
N/A
THCH - GGGSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
LKNCY - GGGSF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
HLFFF - GGGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.75%
DMPZF - GGGSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMZPY - GGGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-5.08%
More