Advertisement
BDULF vs GBCS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDULF is a Hold and GBCS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BDULF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGBCS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BDULF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GBCS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BDULF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBCS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BDULF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- GBCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BDULF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GBCS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.32%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hospital/Nursing Management (-1.38% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
| BDULF | GBCS | BDULF / GBCS | |
| Capitalization | 10B | 6.75M | 148,192% |
| EBITDA | 27.8B | 2M | 1,393,484% |
| Gain YTD | -28.916 | 96.429 | -30% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.11 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 110B | 42.2M | 260,664% |
| Total Cash | 7.05B | 417K | 1,690,647% |
| Total Debt | 18.7B | 31.2M | 59,936% |
BDULF | GBCS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BDULF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GBCS (71). This means that BDULF’s stock grew significantly faster than GBCS’s over the last 12 months.
BDULF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GBCS (100). This means that BDULF’s stock grew similarly to GBCS’s over the last 12 months.
BDULF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBCS (100). This means that BDULF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBCS’s over the last 12 months.
GBCS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BDULF (60). This means that GBCS’s stock grew similarly to BDULF’s over the last 12 months.
GBCS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BDULF (89). This means that GBCS’s stock grew significantly faster than BDULF’s over the last 12 months.
| BDULF | GBCS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 13% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSJV | 26.66 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2031 HY Corp Bd ETF | |||
| LLYX | 26.33 | N/A | N/A |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF | |||
| UBND | 21.99 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| VictoryShares Core Plus Intmdt Bond ETF | |||
| RW | 25.14 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Rainwater Equity ETF | |||
| NCA | 8.82 | -0.01 | -0.11% |
| Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund | |||
BDULF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BDULF and MD have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDULF and MD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BDULF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDULF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MD - BDULF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| PIII - BDULF | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| NUMIF - BDULF | 7% Poorly correlated | +6.13% | ||
| RHEP - BDULF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
| INNV - BDULF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
More | ||||
GBCS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GBCS and PIII have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBCS and PIII's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBCS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBCS | 100% | N/A | ||
| PIII - GBCS | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| PHCI - GBCS | 2% Poorly correlated | -9.51% | ||
| AIRS - GBCS | 2% Poorly correlated | -6.45% | ||
| DCGO - GBCS | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
| BDULF - GBCS | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||