BDRFF
Price
$112.04
Change
-$1.86 (-1.63%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
22.83B
BICEF
Price
$62.75
Change
+$2.90 (+4.85%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDRFF vs BICEF

Header iconBDRFF vs BICEF Comparison
Open Charts BDRFF vs BICEFBanner chart's image
Beiersdorf AG
Price$112.04
Change-$1.86 (-1.63%)
Volume$369
Capitalization22.83B
Bic Stec
Price$62.75
Change+$2.90 (+4.85%)
Volume$7.04K
Capitalization2.57B
BDRFF vs BICEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BDRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BICEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDRFF vs. BICEF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDRFF is a Hold and BICEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BDRFF: $112.04 vs. BICEF: $62.75)
Brand notoriety: BDRFF and BICEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDRFF: 45% vs. BICEF: 402%
Market capitalization -- BDRFF: $22.83B vs. BICEF: $2.57B
BDRFF [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $22.83B. BICEF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $2.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $356.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $20.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDRFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBICEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BDRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BICEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BICEF is a better buy in the long-term than BDRFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDRFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BICEF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDRFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • BICEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDRFF is a better buy in the short-term than BICEF.

Price Growth

BDRFF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BICEF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-2.09% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDRFF($22.8B) has a higher market cap than BICEF($2.57B). BDRFF has higher P/E ratio than BICEF: BDRFF (24.15) vs BICEF (12.63). BICEF YTD gains are higher at: -5.354 vs. BDRFF (-14.202). BDRFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.66B vs. BICEF (384M). BDRFF has more cash in the bank: 2.17B vs. BICEF (313M). BDRFF has less debt than BICEF: BDRFF (114M) vs BICEF (365M). BDRFF has higher revenues than BICEF: BDRFF (9.86B) vs BICEF (2.13B).
BDRFFBICEFBDRFF / BICEF
Capitalization22.8B2.57B886%
EBITDA1.66B384M433%
Gain YTD-14.202-5.354265%
P/E Ratio24.1512.63191%
Revenue9.86B2.13B462%
Total Cash2.17B313M694%
Total Debt114M365M31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDRFF vs BICEF: Fundamental Ratings
BDRFF
BICEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
8070
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8735
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5519

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BICEF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDRFF (59). This means that BICEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDRFF’s over the last 12 months.

BICEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as BDRFF (100). This means that BICEF’s stock grew similarly to BDRFF’s over the last 12 months.

BICEF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as BDRFF (80). This means that BICEF’s stock grew similarly to BDRFF’s over the last 12 months.

BICEF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BDRFF (63). This means that BICEF’s stock grew similarly to BDRFF’s over the last 12 months.

BICEF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDRFF (87). This means that BICEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDRFFBICEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BICEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPWR1.770.14
+8.59%
Complete Solaria Inc
UNF168.763.49
+2.11%
Unifirst Corp
LH280.614.47
+1.62%
Laboratory Corp
FSBC32.81-0.06
-0.18%
Five Star Bancorp
ZBAI9.50-0.07
-0.73%
ATIF Holdings Limited

BDRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDRFF and HENKY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDRFF and HENKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDRFF
1D Price
Change %
BDRFF100%
N/A
HENKY - BDRFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
CAWW - BDRFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BICEF - BDRFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEGIY - BDRFF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
BDRFY - BDRFF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
More

BICEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BICEF and KAOCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BICEF and KAOCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BICEF
1D Price
Change %
BICEF100%
N/A
KAOCF - BICEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDRFF - BICEF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETTYF - BICEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAWW - BICEF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BICEY - BICEF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
More