BDOUF
Price
$3.32
Change
-$0.09 (-2.64%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
14.91B
OVBC
Price
$34.02
Change
+$0.15 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
117.21M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDOUF vs OVBC

Header iconBDOUF vs OVBC Comparison
Open Charts BDOUF vs OVBCBanner chart's image
BDO Unibank
Price$3.32
Change-$0.09 (-2.64%)
Volume$200
Capitalization14.91B
Ohio Valley Banc
Price$34.02
Change+$0.15 (+0.44%)
Volume$9.96K
Capitalization117.21M
BDOUF vs OVBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BDOUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OVBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDOUF vs. OVBC commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDOUF is a Hold and OVBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BDOUF: $3.32 vs. OVBC: $34.02)
Brand notoriety: BDOUF and OVBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDOUF: 2% vs. OVBC: 53%
Market capitalization -- BDOUF: $14.91B vs. OVBC: $117.21M
BDOUF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.91B. OVBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $117.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDOUF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOVBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BDOUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OVBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OVBC is a better buy in the long-term than BDOUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDOUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OVBC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDOUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • OVBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OVBC is a better buy in the short-term than BDOUF.

Price Growth

BDOUF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OVBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +14.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDOUF($14.9B) has a higher market cap than OVBC($117M). OVBC (9.02) and BDOUF (8.74) have similar P/E ratio . OVBC YTD gains are higher at: 42.724 vs. BDOUF (10.299). OVBC has less debt than BDOUF: OVBC (54.3M) vs BDOUF (213B). BDOUF has higher revenues than OVBC: BDOUF (184B) vs OVBC (58.7M).
BDOUFOVBCBDOUF / OVBC
Capitalization14.9B117M12,735%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.29942.72424%
P/E Ratio8.749.0297%
Revenue184B58.7M313,458%
Total CashN/A14.9M-
Total Debt213B54.3M392,265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDOUF vs OVBC: Fundamental Ratings
BDOUF
OVBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2235
SMR RATING
1..100
149
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OVBC's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDOUF (87) in the null industry. This means that OVBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDOUF’s over the last 12 months.

BDOUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as OVBC (35) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BDOUF’s stock grew similarly to OVBC’s over the last 12 months.

BDOUF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OVBC (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BDOUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OVBC’s over the last 12 months.

OVBC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BDOUF (45) in the null industry. This means that OVBC’s stock grew similarly to BDOUF’s over the last 12 months.

OVBC's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BDOUF (20) in the null industry. This means that OVBC’s stock grew similarly to BDOUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDOUFOVBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDOUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OVBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMCCF9.720.57
+6.23%
Amcor plc
SRRPF4.20N/A
N/A
Shagrir Group Veh Svcs Ltd
FSEN12.58N/A
N/A
FS Energy & Power Fund
SFSVF76.62N/A
N/A
Software Service, Inc.
SWONF9.35-0.15
-1.58%
SOFTWAREONE HLDG AG

BDOUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDOUF and EFSG have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDOUF and EFSG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDOUF
1D Price
Change %
BDOUF100%
N/A
EFSG - BDOUF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OVBC - BDOUF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
HBSI - BDOUF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
BPXXY - BDOUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTBRY - BDOUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
More

OVBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OVBC has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OVBC jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OVBC
1D Price
Change %
OVBC100%
+0.44%
FUNC - OVBC
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
UBFO - OVBC
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
LARK - OVBC
33%
Poorly correlated
+4.36%
FRAF - OVBC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
BFIN - OVBC
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
More