BDNNY
Price
$138.80
Change
+$3.80 (+2.81%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
19.37B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EEMMF
Price
$0.82
Change
+$0.04 (+5.13%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
70.28M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDNNY vs EEMMF

Header iconBDNNY vs EEMMF Comparison
Open Charts BDNNY vs EEMMFBanner chart's image
Boliden AB
Price$138.80
Change+$3.80 (+2.81%)
Volume$9.24K
Capitalization19.37B
E3 LITHIUM
Price$0.82
Change+$0.04 (+5.13%)
Volume$5.29K
Capitalization70.28M
BDNNY vs EEMMF Comparison Chart in %
BDNNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EEMMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDNNY vs. EEMMF commentary
Feb 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDNNY is a Hold and EEMMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 07, 2026
Stock price -- (BDNNY: $138.80 vs. EEMMF: $0.82)
Brand notoriety: BDNNY and EEMMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDNNY: 103% vs. EEMMF: 21%
Market capitalization -- BDNNY: $19.37B vs. EEMMF: $70.28M
BDNNY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $19.37B. EEMMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $70.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDNNY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEEMMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BDNNY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • EEMMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BDNNY is a better buy in the long-term than EEMMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDNNY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EEMMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDNNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EEMMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EEMMF is a better buy in the short-term than BDNNY.

Price Growth

BDNNY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.76% price change this week, while EEMMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +73.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

BDNNY is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-2.67% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDNNY($19.4B) has a higher market cap than EEMMF($70.3M). BDNNY YTD gains are higher at: 25.350 vs. EEMMF (20.574). BDNNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19.9B vs. EEMMF (-9.32M). BDNNY has more cash in the bank: 6.59B vs. EEMMF (3.89M). EEMMF has less debt than BDNNY: EEMMF (794K) vs BDNNY (24B). BDNNY has higher revenues than EEMMF: BDNNY (91.2B) vs EEMMF (0).
BDNNYEEMMFBDNNY / EEMMF
Capitalization19.4B70.3M27,596%
EBITDA19.9B-9.32M-213,451%
Gain YTD25.35020.574123%
P/E Ratio18.70N/A-
Revenue91.2B0-
Total Cash6.59B3.89M169,332%
Total Debt24B794K3,022,670%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDNNY vs EEMMF: Fundamental Ratings
BDNNY
EEMMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7569
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
6396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BDNNY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as EEMMF (37). This means that BDNNY’s stock grew similarly to EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

BDNNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EEMMF (100). This means that BDNNY’s stock grew significantly faster than EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

BDNNY's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EEMMF (96). This means that BDNNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

BDNNY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as EEMMF (53). This means that BDNNY’s stock grew similarly to EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

BDNNY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EEMMF (100). This means that BDNNY’s stock grew significantly faster than EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDNNYEEMMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDNNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EEMMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABCFF0.03N/A
+6.31%
Abacus Mining & Exploration Corp.
NRRSF0.890.03
+3.43%
Norsemont Mining Inc.
MGDDY19.490.13
+0.67%
CIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN SA CLERMONT-FERRAND
AGFMF13.300.07
+0.53%
AGF Management Ltd.
NEXXY4.12N/A
N/A
NEXI S.P.A.

BDNNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDNNY has been closely correlated with GLNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BDNNY jumps, then GLNCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDNNY
1D Price
Change %
BDNNY100%
+2.81%
GLNCY - BDNNY
72%
Closely correlated
+3.73%
GLCNF - BDNNY
67%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
RIO - BDNNY
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
BHP - BDNNY
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
TECK - BDNNY
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
More

EEMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EEMMF and NILIF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EEMMF and NILIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EEMMF
1D Price
Change %
EEMMF100%
+5.12%
NILIF - EEMMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
ATUSF - EEMMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
BHP - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
LAC - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.67%
BDNNY - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.81%
More