BDLNF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.48M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RSGOF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
16.77M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDLNF vs RSGOF

Header iconBDLNF vs RSGOF Comparison
Open Charts BDLNF vs RSGOFBanner chart's image
Badlands Resources
Price$0.13
Change-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Volume$5.3K
Capitalization1.48M
RESOURO STRATEGIC METALS
Price$0.16
Change-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization16.77M
BDLNF vs RSGOF Comparison Chart in %
BDLNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RSGOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDLNF vs. RSGOF commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDLNF is a Hold and RSGOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BDLNF: $0.14 vs. RSGOF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: BDLNF and RSGOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDLNF: 37% vs. RSGOF: 21%
Market capitalization -- BDLNF: $1.48M vs. RSGOF: $16.77M
BDLNF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.48M. RSGOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $16.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $118.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDLNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSGOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BDLNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSGOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSGOF is a better buy in the long-term than BDLNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDLNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSGOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDLNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RSGOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDLNF is a better buy in the short-term than RSGOF.

Price Growth

BDLNF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.80% price change this week, while RSGOF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSGOF($16.8M) has a higher market cap than BDLNF($1.48M). BDLNF YTD gains are higher at: 13.891 vs. RSGOF (7.308). RSGOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.18M vs. BDLNF (-11.81M). RSGOF has more cash in the bank: 324K vs. BDLNF (1.13K). RSGOF has less debt than BDLNF: RSGOF (0) vs BDLNF (532K). BDLNF (0) and RSGOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BDLNFRSGOFBDLNF / RSGOF
Capitalization1.48M16.8M9%
EBITDA-11.81M-4.18M283%
Gain YTD13.8917.308190%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.13K324K0%
Total Debt532K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDLNF: Fundamental Ratings
BDLNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDLNFRSGOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDLNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RSGOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYBN6.300.33
+5.53%
Cybin Inc
APP716.9813.70
+1.95%
Applovin Corp
GTLB40.700.20
+0.49%
GitLab
ZD36.15-0.04
-0.11%
Ziff Davis
QTTB3.18-0.16
-4.79%
Q32 Bio

BDLNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDLNF has been loosely correlated with XXMMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDLNF jumps, then XXMMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDLNF
1D Price
Change %
BDLNF100%
N/A
XXMMF - BDLNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TROYF - BDLNF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
VAUCF - BDLNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
FDMIF - BDLNF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
KLKLF - BDLNF
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.83%
More

RSGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSGOF and WGXRF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSGOF and WGXRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSGOF
1D Price
Change %
RSGOF100%
+6.30%
WGXRF - RSGOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
KLKLF - RSGOF
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.83%
OPHRF - RSGOF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
AMQFF - RSGOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
BDLNF - RSGOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More