BDLNF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.49M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KLKLF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.05 (-20.00%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
35.36M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDLNF vs KLKLF

Header iconBDLNF vs KLKLF Comparison
Open Charts BDLNF vs KLKLFBanner chart's image
Badlands Resources
Price$0.18
Change-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization1.49M
KIRKLAND LAKE DISCOVERIES
Price$0.20
Change-$0.05 (-20.00%)
Volume$130.7K
Capitalization35.36M
BDLNF vs KLKLF Comparison Chart in %
BDLNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KLKLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDLNF vs. KLKLF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDLNF is a Buy and KLKLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (BDLNF: $0.14 vs. KLKLF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: BDLNF and KLKLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDLNF: 208% vs. KLKLF: 127%
Market capitalization -- BDLNF: $1.49M vs. KLKLF: $35.36M
BDLNF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.49M. KLKLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $35.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $146.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDLNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKLKLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BDLNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KLKLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KLKLF is a better buy in the long-term than BDLNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDLNF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KLKLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDLNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KLKLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDLNF is a better buy in the short-term than KLKLF.

Price Growth

BDLNF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.09% price change this week, while KLKLF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +95.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.25% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KLKLF($35.4M) has a higher market cap than BDLNF($1.49M). BDLNF YTD gains are higher at: 27.117 vs. KLKLF (-9.091). KLKLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.83M vs. BDLNF (-11.81M). KLKLF has more cash in the bank: 1.15M vs. BDLNF (1.13K). BDLNF (0) and KLKLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BDLNFKLKLFBDLNF / KLKLF
Capitalization1.49M35.4M4%
EBITDA-11.81M-1.83M644%
Gain YTD27.117-9.091-298%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.13K1.15M0%
Total Debt532KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDLNF vs KLKLF: Fundamental Ratings
BDLNF
KLKLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BDLNF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as KLKLF (43). This means that BDLNF’s stock grew similarly to KLKLF’s over the last 12 months.

BDLNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KLKLF (100). This means that BDLNF’s stock grew similarly to KLKLF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKLF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as BDLNF (100). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew similarly to BDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKLF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BDLNF (62). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew similarly to BDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BDLNF (100). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew similarly to BDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDLNFKLKLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDLNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KLKLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELS64.070.87
+1.38%
Equity Lifestyle Properties
SGA11.40-0.04
-0.35%
Saga Communications
GEO15.75-0.09
-0.57%
GEO Group (The)
IBEX34.74-3.28
-8.63%
IBEX Limited
SOBR1.01-0.32
-24.06%
Sobr Safe Inc

BDLNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDLNF has been loosely correlated with XXMMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDLNF jumps, then XXMMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDLNF
1D Price
Change %
BDLNF100%
N/A
XXMMF - BDLNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TROYF - BDLNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+10.54%
VAUCF - BDLNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.56%
FDMIF - BDLNF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.47%
KLKLF - BDLNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KLKLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KLKLF and STLRF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLKLF and STLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLKLF
1D Price
Change %
KLKLF100%
N/A
STLRF - KLKLF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
HMRFF - KLKLF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
LVGLF - KLKLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+11.68%
RSGOF - KLKLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.49%
AMQFF - KLKLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
More