BDLNF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
EMAUF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

BDLNF vs EMAUF

Header iconBDLNF vs EMAUF Comparison
Open Charts BDLNF vs EMAUFBanner chart's image
Badlands Resources
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.62K
CapitalizationN/A
EMPEROR METALS
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$88.35K
CapitalizationN/A
BDLNF vs EMAUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDLNF vs. EMAUF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDLNF is a Hold and EMAUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BDLNF: $0.17 vs. EMAUF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: BDLNF and EMAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDLNF: 93% vs. EMAUF: 94%
Market capitalization -- BDLNF: $0 vs. EMAUF: $3.24M
BDLNF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $0. EMAUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDLNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BDLNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EMAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BDLNF and EMAUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BDLNF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.68% price change this week, while EMAUF (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMAUF YTD gains are higher at: -17.143 vs. BDLNF (-40.127).
BDLNFEMAUFBDLNF / EMAUF
CapitalizationN/A3.24M-
EBITDAN/A-1.06M-
Gain YTD-40.127-17.143234%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A2.37M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDLNF: Fundamental Ratings
BDLNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
29
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BDLNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDLNF has been loosely correlated with BVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDLNF jumps, then BVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDLNF
1D Price
Change %
BDLNF100%
+8.61%
BVN - BDLNF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
CJIMF - BDLNF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
XXMMF - BDLNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MAGE - BDLNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMAUF - BDLNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EMAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMAUF and VITFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMAUF and VITFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMAUF
1D Price
Change %
EMAUF100%
N/A
VITFF - EMAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZMPLF - EMAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDLNF - EMAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
+8.61%
NSUPF - EMAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
MFGCF - EMAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
More