BDLNF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
BVN
Price
$12.89
Change
-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.91B
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BDLNF vs BVN

Header iconBDLNF vs BVN Comparison
Open Charts BDLNF vs BVNBanner chart's image
Badlands Resources
Price$0.13
Change-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
Compania de Minas Buenaventura SA
Price$12.89
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Volume$893.89K
Capitalization3.91B
BDLNF vs BVN Comparison Chart
Loading...
BVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDLNF vs. BVN commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDLNF is a Hold and BVN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BDLNF: $0.13 vs. BVN: $12.89)
Brand notoriety: BDLNF and BVN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDLNF: 9% vs. BVN: 97%
Market capitalization -- BDLNF: $0 vs. BVN: $3.91B
BDLNF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $0. BVN’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDLNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBVN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BDLNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BVN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BVN is a better buy in the long-term than BDLNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BVN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BVN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BDLNF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.23% price change this week, while BVN (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

BVN is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BVN YTD gains are higher at: 11.892 vs. BDLNF (9.874).
BDLNFBVNBDLNF / BVN
CapitalizationN/A3.91B-
EBITDAN/A178M-
Gain YTD9.87411.89283%
P/E RatioN/A6.95-
RevenueN/A816M-
Total CashN/A222M-
Total DebtN/A50M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDLNF vs BVN: Fundamental Ratings
BDLNF
BVN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9265
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10027
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BVN's Valuation (19) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BDLNF (23) in the null industry. This means that BVN’s stock grew similarly to BDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

BVN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BDLNF (100) in the null industry. This means that BVN’s stock grew similarly to BDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

BVN's SMR Rating (65) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BDLNF (92) in the null industry. This means that BVN’s stock grew similarly to BDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

BVN's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BDLNF (63) in the null industry. This means that BVN’s stock grew similarly to BDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

BVN's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for BDLNF (100) in the null industry. This means that BVN’s stock grew significantly faster than BDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BVN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
BTC.X104408.070000-53.968750
-0.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

BDLNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDLNF has been loosely correlated with BVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDLNF jumps, then BVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDLNF
1D Price
Change %
BDLNF100%
-4.86%
BVN - BDLNF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
CJIMF - BDLNF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
XXMMF - BDLNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MAGE - BDLNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-8.05%
EMAUF - BDLNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+23.67%
More

BVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVN has been loosely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BVN jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVN
1D Price
Change %
BVN100%
-0.08%
CDE - BVN
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
EGO - BVN
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
MAG - BVN
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
SILV - BVN
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
GATO - BVN
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More