BDGSF
Price
$55.65
Change
-$12.55 (-18.40%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.92B
PBKC
Price
$55.00
Change
-$2.00 (-3.51%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDGSF vs PBKC

Header iconBDGSF vs PBKC Comparison
Open Charts BDGSF vs PBKCBanner chart's image
Bank of Ga Group
Price$55.65
Change-$12.55 (-18.40%)
Volume$330
Capitalization1.92B
Pioneer Bank
Price$55.00
Change-$2.00 (-3.51%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
BDGSF vs PBKC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BDGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBKC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDGSF vs. PBKC commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDGSF is a Hold and PBKC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BDGSF: $55.65 vs. PBKC: $55.00)
Brand notoriety: BDGSF and PBKC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDGSF: 100% vs. PBKC: 72%
Market capitalization -- BDGSF: $1.92B vs. PBKC: $0
BDGSF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.92B. PBKC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDGSF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePBKC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BDGSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PBKC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BDGSF and PBKC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDGSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBKC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDGSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PBKC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDGSF is a better buy in the short-term than PBKC.

Price Growth

BDGSF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PBKC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBKC YTD gains are higher at: 13.960 vs. BDGSF (-8.108).
BDGSFPBKCBDGSF / PBKC
Capitalization1.92BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.10813.960-58%
P/E Ratio3.38N/A-
Revenue2.03BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.53BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDGSF vs PBKC: Fundamental Ratings
BDGSF
PBKC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
123
SMR RATING
1..100
845
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4962
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BDGSF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as PBKC (35). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew similarly to PBKC’s over the last 12 months.

PBKC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (12). This means that PBKC’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

BDGSF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBKC (45). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBKC’s over the last 12 months.

PBKC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (62). This means that PBKC’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

BDGSF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as PBKC (62). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew similarly to PBKC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDGSFPBKC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBKC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDBH5.110.81
+18.95%
MDB Capital Holdings LLC
PCSA0.190.01
+3.34%
Processa Pharmaceuticals
RSVR7.880.15
+1.94%
Reservoir Media
BWXT142.912.14
+1.52%
BWX Technologies
VSH17.210.19
+1.12%
Vishay Intertechnology

BDGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDGSF has been loosely correlated with MTPOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDGSF jumps, then MTPOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDGSF
1D Price
Change %
BDGSF100%
N/A
MTPOY - BDGSF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PBKC - BDGSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBTT - BDGSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
SOBS - BDGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCAL - BDGSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More

PBKC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBKC and NSTS have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBKC and NSTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBKC
1D Price
Change %
PBKC100%
N/A
NSTS - PBKC
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
BDGSF - PBKC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOY - PBKC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFI - PBKC
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCBX - PBKC
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
More