BDGSF
Price
$55.65
Change
-$12.55 (-18.40%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.92B
MTPOY
Price
$27.30
Change
+$0.30 (+1.11%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDGSF vs MTPOY

Header iconBDGSF vs MTPOY Comparison
Open Charts BDGSF vs MTPOYBanner chart's image
Bank of Ga Group
Price$55.65
Change-$12.55 (-18.40%)
Volume$330
Capitalization1.92B
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
Price$27.30
Change+$0.30 (+1.11%)
Volume$200
Capitalization4.8B
BDGSF vs MTPOY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BDGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTPOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDGSF vs. MTPOY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDGSF is a Hold and MTPOY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BDGSF: $55.65 vs. MTPOY: $27.30)
Brand notoriety: BDGSF and MTPOY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDGSF: 100% vs. MTPOY: 92%
Market capitalization -- BDGSF: $1.92B vs. MTPOY: $4.8B
BDGSF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.92B. MTPOY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDGSF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMTPOY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BDGSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MTPOY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTPOY is a better buy in the long-term than BDGSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDGSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTPOY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDGSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MTPOY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDGSF is a better buy in the short-term than MTPOY.

Price Growth

BDGSF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MTPOY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTPOY($4.8B) has a higher market cap than BDGSF($1.92B). MTPOY has higher P/E ratio than BDGSF: MTPOY (7.91) vs BDGSF (3.38). MTPOY YTD gains are higher at: 2.845 vs. BDGSF (-8.108). BDGSF has less debt than MTPOY: BDGSF (3.53B) vs MTPOY (102B). MTPOY has higher revenues than BDGSF: MTPOY (118B) vs BDGSF (2.03B).
BDGSFMTPOYBDGSF / MTPOY
Capitalization1.92B4.8B40%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.1082.845-285%
P/E Ratio3.387.9143%
Revenue2.03B118B2%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.53B102B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDGSF vs MTPOY: Fundamental Ratings
BDGSF
MTPOY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
126
SMR RATING
1..100
81
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4946
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BDGSF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOY (36). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOY’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (12). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (8). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (62). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (49). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDGSFMTPOY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTPOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QMOM64.150.56
+0.88%
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
GOF14.950.05
+0.34%
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
JANH24.680.02
+0.09%
Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Jan
LIAU228.19N/A
N/A
LifeX 2060 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
SJB15.60-0.01
-0.03%
ProShares Short High Yield

BDGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDGSF has been loosely correlated with MTPOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDGSF jumps, then MTPOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDGSF
1D Price
Change %
BDGSF100%
N/A
MTPOY - BDGSF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PBKC - BDGSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBTT - BDGSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
SOBS - BDGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCAL - BDGSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More

MTPOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTPOY has been loosely correlated with BDGSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTPOY jumps, then BDGSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTPOY
1D Price
Change %
MTPOY100%
N/A
BDGSF - MTPOY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HCKG - MTPOY
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
PBKC - MTPOY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTBP - MTPOY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - MTPOY
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.46%
More