BDGSF
Price
$55.65
Change
-$12.55 (-18.40%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
4.21B
MTPOY
Price
$27.30
Change
+$0.30 (+1.11%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDGSF vs MTPOY

Header iconBDGSF vs MTPOY Comparison
Open Charts BDGSF vs MTPOYBanner chart's image
Bank of Ga Group
Price$55.65
Change-$12.55 (-18.40%)
Volume$330
Capitalization4.21B
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
Price$27.30
Change+$0.30 (+1.11%)
Volume$200
Capitalization5.46B
BDGSF vs MTPOY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDGSF vs. MTPOY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDGSF is a Buy and MTPOY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BDGSF: $55.65 vs. MTPOY: $27.30)
Brand notoriety: BDGSF and MTPOY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDGSF: 100% vs. MTPOY: 100%
Market capitalization -- BDGSF: $4.21B vs. MTPOY: $5.46B
BDGSF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.21B. MTPOY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDGSF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMTPOY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BDGSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MTPOY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BDGSF and MTPOY are a good buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BDGSF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MTPOY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTPOY($5.46B) has a higher market cap than BDGSF($4.21B). MTPOY has higher P/E ratio than BDGSF: MTPOY (7.13) vs BDGSF (3.46). MTPOY YTD gains are higher at: 2.845 vs. BDGSF (-8.108). BDGSF has less debt than MTPOY: BDGSF (11.5B) vs MTPOY (105B). MTPOY has higher revenues than BDGSF: MTPOY (151B) vs BDGSF (3.94B).
BDGSFMTPOYBDGSF / MTPOY
Capitalization4.21B5.46B77%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.1082.845-285%
P/E Ratio3.467.1349%
Revenue3.94B151B3%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt11.5B105B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDGSF vs MTPOY: Fundamental Ratings
BDGSF
MTPOY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
145
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4035
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BDGSF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTPOY (43). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTPOY’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (14). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (9). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (61). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (40). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDGSFMTPOY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKRE9.580.20
+2.13%
Tuttle Cptl Dl 2X Invrs Rgnl Banks ETF
AVIG42.050.17
+0.41%
Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF
TDSB22.950.07
+0.29%
ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF
GUT5.980.01
+0.17%
Gabelli Utility Trust
RZB24.840.03
+0.12%
Reinsurance Group of America

BDGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDGSF has been loosely correlated with MTPOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDGSF jumps, then MTPOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDGSF
1D Price
Change %
BDGSF100%
N/A
MTPOY - BDGSF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PBKC - BDGSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBTT - BDGSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOBS - BDGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCAL - BDGSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
More

MTPOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTPOY has been loosely correlated with BDGSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTPOY jumps, then BDGSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTPOY
1D Price
Change %
MTPOY100%
N/A
BDGSF - MTPOY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HCKG - MTPOY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBKC - MTPOY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTBP - MTPOY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - MTPOY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More