Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDGS vs RECS
BDGS vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDGS vs. RECS commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDGS is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.42B vs. BDGS (45.1M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than BDGS: RECS (12.103) vs BDGS (7.676). BDGS was incepted earlier than RECS: BDGS (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than BDGS (0.88). BDGS has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| BDGS | RECS | BDGS / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 7.676 | 12.103 | 63% |
| Net Assets | 45.1M | 3.42B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.15 | 587% |
| Turnover | 209.00 | 49.00 | 427% |
| Yield | 1.72 | 0.64 | 269% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BDGS | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 14% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 28% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 18% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| INCO | 63.72 | 0.34 | +0.53% |
| Columbia India Consumer ETF | |||
| BTRN | 40.58 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | |||
| RSDE | 21.19 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Eql Wght Buffr ETF - Dec | |||
| CORP | 97.31 | -0.11 | -0.11% |
| PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF | |||
| MVFD | 26.55 | -0.08 | -0.31% |
| Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF | |||
BDGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BDGS and NFLX have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDGS and NFLX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BDGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDGS | 100% | N/A | ||
| NFLX - BDGS | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| CVX - BDGS | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| XOM - BDGS | -5% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| AAPL - BDGS | -6% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| PLTR - BDGS | -7% Poorly correlated | -2.13% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||