Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDFFX vs NRGSX
BDFFX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts BDFFX vs NRGSX
BDFFX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDFFX vs. NRGSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDFFX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.49B vs. BDFFX (1.84B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than BDFFX: NRGSX (0.48) vs BDFFX (0.00). BDFFX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: BDFFX (12 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). BDFFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). BDFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDFFX: NRGSX (0) vs BDFFX (2000). BDFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.23 vs. NRGSX (-12.75). BDFFX return over 5 years is better than : -10.90 vs. NRGSX (-23.10).
| BDFFX | NRGSX | BDFFX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.74 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.74 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.913 | 5.452 | -53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 8.49B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.23 | -12.75 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.78 | -6.33 | -423% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.90 | -23.10 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 253.46 | 24.83 | 1,021% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers