Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDFFX vs NRGSX
BDFFX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts BDFFX vs NRGSX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.83
Change+$0.89 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.56B
BDFFX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDFFX vs. NRGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDFFX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.56B vs. BDFFX (1.95B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than BDFFX: NRGSX (0.07) vs BDFFX (0.00). BDFFX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: BDFFX (12 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). BDFFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). BDFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDFFX: NRGSX (0) vs BDFFX (2000). BDFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.92 vs. NRGSX (-14.38). BDFFX return over 5 years is better than : 10.34 vs. NRGSX (-7.82).
| BDFFX | NRGSX | BDFFX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.74 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.74 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.310 | -3.565 | -289% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 8.56B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | -14.38 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.66 | -2.58 | -1,730% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.34 | -7.82 | -132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.34 | 7.54 | 2,764% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement