Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDFFX vs NRGSX
BDFFX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts BDFFX vs NRGSX
BDFFX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDFFX vs. NRGSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDFFX is a Buy and NRGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. BDFFX (1.94B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than BDFFX: NRGSX (0.07) vs BDFFX (0.00). BDFFX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: BDFFX (12 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). BDFFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). BDFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDFFX: NRGSX (0) vs BDFFX (2000). BDFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. NRGSX (-17.45). BDFFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.40 vs. NRGSX (-21.20).
| BDFFX | NRGSX | BDFFX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.74 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.74 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.279 | -15.960 | -83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 8.19B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | -17.45 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.76 | 1.18 | 5,386% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.40 | -21.20 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 211.95 | 6.91 | 3,068% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement