BDDDY
Price
$24.57
Change
+$0.89 (+3.76%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
8.36B
USFD
Price
$76.12
Change
+$1.17 (+1.56%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
17.14B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDDDY vs USFD

Header iconBDDDY vs USFD Comparison
Open Charts BDDDY vs USFDBanner chart's image
Bid
Price$24.57
Change+$0.89 (+3.76%)
Volume$147
Capitalization8.36B
US Foods Holding
Price$76.12
Change+$1.17 (+1.56%)
Volume$1.57M
Capitalization17.14B
BDDDY vs USFD Comparison Chart in %
USFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDDDY vs. USFD commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDDDY is a Hold and USFD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BDDDY: $24.57 vs. USFD: $76.12)
Brand notoriety: BDDDY and USFD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDDDY: 100% vs. USFD: 81%
Market capitalization -- BDDDY: $8.36B vs. USFD: $17.14B
BDDDY [@Food Distributors] is valued at $8.36B. USFD’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $17.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $38.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $4.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDDDY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSFD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BDDDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USFD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, USFD is a better buy in the long-term than BDDDY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

USFD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • USFD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BDDDY (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while USFD (@Food Distributors) price change was +1.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

USFD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-1.52% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USFD($17.1B) has a higher market cap than BDDDY($8.36B). USFD has higher P/E ratio than BDDDY: USFD (32.53) vs BDDDY (18.41). USFD YTD gains are higher at: 12.837 vs. BDDDY (0.000). BDDDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.6B vs. USFD (1.49B). BDDDY has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. USFD (61M). USFD has less debt than BDDDY: USFD (5.01B) vs BDDDY (22.4B). BDDDY has higher revenues than USFD: BDDDY (226B) vs USFD (38.7B).
BDDDYUSFDBDDDY / USFD
Capitalization8.36B17.1B49%
EBITDA15.6B1.49B1,044%
Gain YTD0.00012.837-
P/E Ratio18.4132.5357%
Revenue226B38.7B584%
Total Cash11.7B61M19,180%
Total Debt22.4B5.01B447%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
USFD: Fundamental Ratings
USFD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDDDYUSFD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
USFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSFY26.680.13
+0.50%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Microsoft ETF
ONEZ26.510.11
+0.40%
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buf ETF
AOTG55.500.16
+0.28%
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF
SPBO29.78-0.03
-0.10%
SPDR® Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF
EFT11.52-0.02
-0.17%
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust

BDDDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDDDY and ANDE have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDDDY and ANDE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDDDY
1D Price
Change %
BDDDY100%
N/A
ANDE - BDDDY
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
USFD - BDDDY
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
CHEF - BDDDY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
HFFG - BDDDY
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
SPTN - BDDDY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

USFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USFD has been closely correlated with PFGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USFD jumps, then PFGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USFD
1D Price
Change %
USFD100%
+1.56%
PFGC - USFD
75%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
CHEF - USFD
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
SYY - USFD
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
UNFI - USFD
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
ANDE - USFD
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
More