BDC
Price
$120.10
Change
+$7.12 (+6.30%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.72B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CLFD
Price
$28.29
Change
-$0.07 (-0.25%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
391.51M
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDC vs CLFD

Header iconBDC vs CLFD Comparison
Open Charts BDC vs CLFDBanner chart's image
Belden
Price$120.10
Change+$7.12 (+6.30%)
Volume$382.16K
Capitalization4.72B
Clearfield
Price$28.29
Change-$0.07 (-0.25%)
Volume$126.13K
Capitalization391.51M
BDC vs CLFD Comparison Chart in %
BDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CLFD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDC vs. CLFD commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDC is a StrongBuy and CLFD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BDC: $112.91 vs. CLFD: $28.38)
Brand notoriety: BDC and CLFD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDC: 13% vs. CLFD: 39%
Market capitalization -- BDC: $4.44B vs. CLFD: $394.76M
BDC [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $4.44B. CLFD’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $394.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $300.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $9.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLFD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BDC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BDC is a better buy in the long-term than CLFD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLFD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CLFD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDC is a better buy in the short-term than CLFD.

Price Growth

BDC (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -0.58% price change this week, while CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

BDC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

CLFD is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+0.89% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDC($4.72B) has a higher market cap than CLFD($392M). CLFD has higher P/E ratio than BDC: CLFD (62.87) vs BDC (21.37). BDC YTD gains are higher at: 0.400 vs. CLFD (-8.452). BDC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 420M vs. CLFD (9.21M). CLFD has less debt than BDC: CLFD (21.7M) vs BDC (1.37B). BDC has higher revenues than CLFD: BDC (2.62B) vs CLFD (179M).
BDCCLFDBDC / CLFD
Capitalization4.72B392M1,204%
EBITDA420M9.21M4,562%
Gain YTD0.400-8.452-5%
P/E Ratio21.3762.8734%
Revenue2.62B179M1,463%
Total CashN/A117M-
Total Debt1.37B21.7M6,304%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDC vs CLFD: Fundamental Ratings
BDC
CLFD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2591
SMR RATING
1..100
4790
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6180
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5038

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BDC's Valuation (45) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CLFD (69) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

BDC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Electrical Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLFD (91) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew significantly faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

BDC's SMR Rating (47) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (90) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

BDC's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CLFD (80) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

BDC's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CLFD (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDCCLFD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CLFD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOPAX27.52N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Special Opps A
CIGYX11.32N/A
N/A
AB Concentrated International Growth Adv
GSINX23.16N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Inv
DLCFX17.44N/A
N/A
Destinations Large Cap Equity I
ABCRX23.58N/A
N/A
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq R6

BDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDC has been closely correlated with ZBRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BDC jumps, then ZBRA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDC
1D Price
Change %
BDC100%
+0.03%
ZBRA - BDC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
HPE - BDC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
DGII - BDC
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
EXTR - BDC
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
LITE - BDC
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.62%
More

CLFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with EXTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then EXTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLFD
1D Price
Change %
CLFD100%
-0.51%
EXTR - CLFD
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
HPE - CLFD
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
BDC - CLFD
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
UI - CLFD
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
AVNW - CLFD
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
More