Advertisement
BDC vs CLFD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDC is a Hold and CLFD is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BDC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLFD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BDC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CLFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BDC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLFD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BDC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CLFD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
BDC (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +1.39% price change this week, while CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
BDC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
CLFD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Telecommunications Equipment (+1.19% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
| BDC | CLFD | BDC / CLFD | |
| Capitalization | 5.2B | 475M | 1,095% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 9.21M | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.708 | 11.032 | 151% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.86 | 3442.00 | 1% |
| Revenue | N/A | 179M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 117M | - |
| Total Debt | 1.37B | 21.7M | 6,304% |
BDC | CLFD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BDC's Valuation (53) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (98) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
BDC's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Electrical Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLFD (86) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew significantly faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
BDC's SMR Rating (48) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (92) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
BDC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CLFD (61) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
CLFD's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as BDC (48) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to BDC’s over the last 12 months.
| BDC | CLFD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 65% | 22 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RTIRX | 12.65 | -0.01 | -0.08% |
| Russell Inv Multifactor Intl Eq R6 | |||
| FINFX | 93.70 | -0.16 | -0.17% |
| American Funds Fundamental Invs F2 | |||
| JSCOX | 23.90 | -0.04 | -0.17% |
| Janus Henderson Small Cap Value I | |||
| MNHCX | 26.65 | -0.12 | -0.45% |
| Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L | |||
| GSDPX | 52.84 | -0.37 | -0.70% |
| Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq P | |||
BDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDC has been closely correlated with ZBRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BDC jumps, then ZBRA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDC | 100% | +0.64% | ||
| ZBRA - BDC | 71% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| DGII - BDC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| HPE - BDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| LITE - BDC | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| EXTR - BDC | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
More | ||||
CLFD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with EXTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then EXTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLFD | 100% | +1.06% | ||
| EXTR - CLFD | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| DGII - CLFD | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| BDC - CLFD | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| ZBRA - CLFD | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| CIEN - CLFD | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||