Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAUX vs RGACX
BDAUX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAUX vs RGACX
Baron Durable Advantage R6
Price$32.13
Change+$0.35 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets539.88M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
BDAUX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAUX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAUX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. BDAUX (540M). BDAUX pays higher dividends than RGACX: BDAUX (0.20) vs RGACX (0.07). BDAUX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BDAUX (8 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than BDAUX (0.74). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAUX (4.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAUX: RGACX (250) vs BDAUX (5000000). BDAUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.34 vs. RGACX (17.83). BDAUX return over 5 years is better than : 121.87 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| BDAUX | RGACX | BDAUX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.94 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.190 | 15.516 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 540M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.07 | 287% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.34 | 17.83 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.43 | 58.53 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 121.87 | 40.02 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement