Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAUX vs GFACX
BDAUX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAUX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage R6
Price$32.74
Change+$0.36 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets528.24M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.72
Change+$0.95 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
BDAUX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAUX vs. GFACX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAUX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. BDAUX (528M). BDAUX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAUX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAUX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAUX (8 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAUX (0.74). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAUX (4.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAUX: GFACX (250) vs BDAUX (5000000). BDAUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. GFACX (9.41). BDAUX return over 5 years is better than : 117.25 vs. GFACX (30.67).
| BDAUX | GFACX | BDAUX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.36 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.36 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.105 | 17.268 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 528M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.79 | 9.41 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 114.58 | 64.76 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.25 | 30.67 | 382% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement