Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAIX vs GFACX
BDAIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAIX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Institutional
Price$33.78
Change+$0.08 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets534.6M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
BDAIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAIX vs. GFACX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAIX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. BDAIX (535M). BDAIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAIX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAIX (8 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than BDAIX (0.77). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BDAIX (13.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAIX: GFACX (250) vs BDAIX (1000000). BDAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.82 vs. GFACX (3.47). BDAIX return over 5 years is better than : 119.87 vs. GFACX (12.83).
| BDAIX | GFACX | BDAIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.35 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.35 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.029 | 6.775 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 535M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.82 | 3.47 | 428% |
| Returns for 3 years | 118.64 | 56.11 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 119.87 | 12.83 | 934% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement