Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAIX vs GFACX
BDAIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAIX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Institutional
Price$32.38
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets521.78M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
BDAIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAIX vs. GFACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAIX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. BDAIX (522M). BDAIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAIX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAIX (8 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAIX (0.77). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAIX (4.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAIX: GFACX (250) vs BDAIX (1000000). BDAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.77 vs. GFACX (9.41). BDAIX return over 5 years is better than : 117.22 vs. GFACX (30.67).
| BDAIX | GFACX | BDAIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.36 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.36 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.127 | 17.268 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 522M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.77 | 9.41 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 114.55 | 64.76 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.22 | 30.67 | 382% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers