Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs RGAHX
BDAFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs RGAHX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$32.70
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets524.7M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$88.38
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
BDAFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Buy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. BDAFX (525M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BDAFX: RGAHX (0.44) vs BDAFX (0.01). BDAFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BDAFX (8 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BDAFX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (4.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: RGAHX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.91 vs. RGAHX (8.04). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 110.53 vs. RGAHX (32.70).
| BDAFX | RGAHX | BDAFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.44 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.44 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.793 | 20.343 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 525M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.44 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.91 | 8.04 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.75 | 63.83 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.53 | 32.70 | 338% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement