Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs RGAHX
BDAFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs RGAHX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$31.88
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets521.78M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.76
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
BDAFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. BDAFX (522M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BDAFX: RGAHX (0.45) vs BDAFX (0.01). BDAFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BDAFX (8 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BDAFX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (4.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: RGAHX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. RGAHX (11.73). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.63 vs. RGAHX (40.74).
| BDAFX | RGAHX | BDAFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.44 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.44 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.882 | 18.137 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 522M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.45 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.49 | 11.73 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.96 | 72.76 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.63 | 40.74 | 281% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement