Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs RGACX
BDAFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs RGACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$31.88
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets521.78M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
BDAFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. BDAFX (522M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BDAFX: RGACX (0.07) vs BDAFX (0.01). BDAFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BDAFX (8 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BDAFX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (4.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: RGACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. RGACX (11.01). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.63 vs. RGACX (37.85).
| BDAFX | RGACX | BDAFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.94 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.94 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.882 | 17.655 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 522M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.07 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.49 | 11.01 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.96 | 70.57 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.63 | 37.85 | 303% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement