Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs RGACX
BDAFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs RGACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$33.24
Change+$0.08 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets534.6M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
BDAFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. BDAFX (535M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BDAFX: RGACX (0.07) vs BDAFX (0.01). BDAFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BDAFX (8 years) vs RGACX (24 years). BDAFX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BDAFX (13.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: RGACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.50 vs. RGACX (5.45). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 117.08 vs. RGACX (20.43).
| BDAFX | RGACX | BDAFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.93 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.93 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.705 | 8.821 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 535M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.07 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.50 | 5.45 | 266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 116.99 | 63.36 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.08 | 20.43 | 573% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement