Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs RGACX
BDAFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs RGACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$32.07
Change-$0.63 (-1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.31M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
BDAFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. BDAFX (522M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BDAFX: RGACX (0.07) vs BDAFX (0.01). BDAFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BDAFX (8 years) vs RGACX (24 years). BDAFX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (4.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: RGACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. RGACX (8.31). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 109.70 vs. RGACX (37.90).
| BDAFX | RGACX | BDAFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.94 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.94 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.559 | 19.364 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 522M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.07 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 8.31 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.60 | 63.31 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.70 | 37.90 | 289% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement