Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs GFACX
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$33.33
Change-$0.19 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets544.38M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.33
Change-$0.74 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. GFACX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. BDAFX (544M). BDAFX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BDAFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAFX (8 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than BDAFX (1.04). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BDAFX (13.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: GFACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.57 vs. GFACX (6.90). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 118.95 vs. GFACX (10.69).
| BDAFX | GFACX | BDAFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.35 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.35 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.523 | 1.530 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 544M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.57 | 6.90 | 269% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.24 | 47.58 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 118.95 | 10.69 | 1,113% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers