Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs FFAFX
BDAFX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs FFAFX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$32.07
Change-$0.63 (-1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.31M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
BDAFX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. BDAFX (522M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than BDAFX: FFAFX (0.53) vs BDAFX (0.01). BDAFX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: BDAFX (8 years) vs FFAFX (5 years). BDAFX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (4.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: FFAFX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. FFAFX (7.00). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 109.70 vs. FFAFX (39.96).
| BDAFX | FFAFX | BDAFX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.35 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.35 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.559 | 17.358 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 522M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.53 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 7.00 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.60 | 65.28 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.70 | 39.96 | 275% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement