BCVVF
Price
$8.15
Change
+$0.07 (+0.87%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.8B
CSASF
Price
$19.89
Change
+$4.09 (+25.89%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCVVF vs CSASF

Header iconBCVVF vs CSASF Comparison
Open Charts BCVVF vs CSASFBanner chart's image
BOC Aviation
Price$8.15
Change+$0.07 (+0.87%)
Volume$24.5K
Capitalization5.8B
Credit Saison
Price$19.89
Change+$4.09 (+25.89%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.52B
BCVVF vs CSASF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCVVF vs. CSASF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCVVF is a Hold and CSASF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BCVVF: $8.15 vs. CSASF: $19.89)
Brand notoriety: BCVVF and CSASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCVVF: 545% vs. CSASF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BCVVF: $5.8B vs. CSASF: $2.52B
BCVVF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.8B. CSASF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $2.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCVVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSASF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCVVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSASF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSASF is a better buy in the long-term than BCVVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCVVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BCVVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BCVVF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CSASF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCVVF($5.8B) has a higher market cap than CSASF($2.52B). BCVVF has higher P/E ratio than CSASF: BCVVF (270.27) vs CSASF (6.34). BCVVF YTD gains are higher at: 8.067 vs. CSASF (0.000). CSASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 108B vs. BCVVF (1.54B). CSASF has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. BCVVF (85.2M). BCVVF has less debt than CSASF: BCVVF (15.1B) vs CSASF (2.81T). CSASF has higher revenues than BCVVF: CSASF (383B) vs BCVVF (2.14B).
BCVVFCSASFBCVVF / CSASF
Capitalization5.8B2.52B230%
EBITDA1.54B108B1%
Gain YTD8.0670.000-
P/E Ratio270.276.344,265%
Revenue2.14B383B1%
Total Cash85.2M160B0%
Total Debt15.1B2.81T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCVVF vs CSASF: Fundamental Ratings
BCVVF
CSASF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
541
SMR RATING
1..100
52100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4571
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6946
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCVVF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as CSASF (32). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew similarly to CSASF’s over the last 12 months.

CSASF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCVVF (54). This means that CSASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCVVF’s over the last 12 months.

BCVVF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSASF (100). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSASF’s over the last 12 months.

BCVVF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CSASF (71). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew similarly to CSASF’s over the last 12 months.

CSASF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BCVVF (69). This means that CSASF’s stock grew similarly to BCVVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCVVFCSASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PINPX15.770.11
+0.70%
Principal Diversified Intl R5
FWCGX70.830.39
+0.55%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc529F3
BOGIX30.740.12
+0.39%
SGI Small Cap Core Fund I Shares
FAMDX26.160.08
+0.31%
FAM Small Cap Institutional
FSOPX14.59N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Small Cap Opps

BCVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCVVF and BDIMF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCVVF and BDIMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCVVF
1D Price
Change %
BCVVF100%
N/A
BDIMF - BCVVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
AMIVF - BCVVF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
BRRAY - BCVVF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASHTY - BCVVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+3.95%
CSASF - BCVVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CSASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSASF and ELEEF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSASF and ELEEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSASF
1D Price
Change %
CSASF100%
N/A
ELEEF - CSASF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
ECNCF - CSASF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DWIS - CSASF
1%
Poorly correlated
-12.50%
EDNMY - CSASF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
EDNMF - CSASF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More